|
"It's clear that the local neighbors were trying to maintain this person in custody so they could turn him over to police," Slotnick said. "They had every good reason to believe that he was being looked for, and they acted accordingly." Vigilante cases are rarely simple, whether it's a homeowner who kills an intruder, a robbery victim fending off his attackers or neighbors making a citizens' arrest. Last month, an Oklahoma City pharmacist pulled a weapon from behind a counter and killed a would-be thief. He was charged with first-degree murder; prosecutors said he fired additional shots at the thief after he was down. Oklahoma is among states with laws protecting homeowners who use lethal force to protect themselves from intruders. Sex offenders, whose addresses often are listed publicly under Megan's Law statutes, are frequent targets for vigilantes, as evidenced by cases from Maine to Tennessee to Washington. In 2007, authorities said two Tennessee men set fire to the home of a suspected child pornographer, killing his wife. Both were charged with murder and arson. Richard Maxwell Brown, a professor emeritus at the University of Oregon who has published several books about vigilantism, said the Philadelphia case is a difficult one. "They were in no doubt that what they were doing was correct in punishing him," Brown said. "If they were assisting the police, they really crossed the line when they laid a hand on this person." The Kensington neighbors patrolled the streets for more than a day before they found Carrasquillo. They had handed out the mugshots to everyone on the street, from drug dealers to business owners, said Louis Valentine, who was there when the group found its target. Scrawled in marker on the photo handouts was "Known For Rape!" But Valentine was hesitant to call the Carrasquillo case vigilante justice. "We had to get this guy off the street," he said. "Was it justice? He hasn't gotten justice yet." Efforts by The Associated Press to interview Genval and Vargas were unsuccessful. "Our society does not countenance vigilante justice," said Jim Fox, the district attorney in San Mateo County, Calif., and chairman of the board of the National District Attorneys Association. "That's not a civilized society." In all cases, authorities must consider the message a decision will send. Philadelphia police will have to deal with fallout from their decision, Fox said, whether perceived or real. "By not charging, I'm sure that some will argue that that will just give carte blanche to people who engage in vigilantism," he said. "It certainly is the wrong message to send that people will seek justice on their own outside the system." But Ramsey said his decision should not be interpreted that way. "I just think you have to look beyond the emotion on either side," he said. "I don't suggest people get out here and think they can beat the crap out of people for no reason."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor