|
"Isn't it a little unfair to both require railroads to carry this stuff, and then say they are fully liable?" White asked. Some railroads have opposed mandatory rerouting of hazardous freight -- a rule debated for years before its final implementation early this year. They argued there's often no alternative to running trains through cities and that upgrading out-of-the-way tracks to bear tanker-car loads would prove costly. "Rerouting can also substantially increase the distance a material travels and the amount of handling it requires," White said. "That in itself can increase the safety risk." Among 27 criteria railways are required to consider as they draw up rerouting plans is whether tankers pass by what regulators call "iconic targets"
-- well-known landmarks terrorists might want to hit. Plans are due in to regulators in a few months. Some rail companies already are steering more trains onto lines that cut through villages, towns and suburbs to bypass chronic train-track congestion in Chicago, the nation's premier rail hub. Outlying communities say that the mandatory reroutes increase their exposure to derailments. Canadian National Railway, whose train derailed in Rockford in northern Illinois, is among those seeking ways to avoid Chicago. CN recently bought the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway line that loops around Chicago and through 30 suburbs. CN declined to discuss the Rockford accident. Federal investigators say it could take a year to pinpoint a cause. ___ On the Net: Federal Railroad Administration: http://www.fra.dot.gov/ American Association of Railroads: http://www.aar.org/
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor