|
 Chief Judge James F. Holderman of U.S. District Court said in an order issued Friday that "no legal precedent supports the granting of the relief sought by the defendant Blagojevich in this motion."
Blagojevich had argued that removing U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald from the case was necessary because the prosecutor made inflammatory remarks about him at a news conference after the then-governor was arrested Dec. 9.
He said Robert Grant, special agent in charge of the Chicago FBI office, had made similar remarks. He also said Fitzgerald crossed the line by making public transcripts of wiretaps of Blagojevich conversations that should have been sealed.
Among other things, Fitzgerald said Blagojevich had been on "a white-collar crime spree" that would make Abraham Lincoln "roll over in his grave."
A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, Randall Samborn, said he had no comment on Holderman's order.
The judge didn't get into the specifics of the remarks Fitzgerald and Grant made at the news conference where the charges against Blagojevich and his chief of staff, John Harris, were unveiled.
Nor did he close the door on Blagojevich making the same argument again.
"If an indictment is returned charging defendant Blagojevich with federal, criminal offenses, the district judge to whom the case will be assigned pursuant to the clerk's office random assignment system, will be the appropriate judicial officer to address the matter if raised at that time by the defendant," Holderman wrote.
Blagojevich and Harris are charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit fraud and solicitation of bribery. Holderman has set an April 7 deadline for the government to obtain an indictment from a grand jury.
| 
