|
"If the mine soils are compacted like a Wal-Mart parking lot, where you have 100 percent runoff, zero percent infiltration of rainwater, you can imagine what kind of erosion and gullying will occur," Angel said. "There's no force in nature more powerful than running water. With this forestry reclamation approach, mine soils are very loose and porous, such that water is soaked up like a sponge." Angel said landowners and coal operators traditionally have opted to turn mine lands into hay and pasture land after the coal has been removed and the mountaintops flattened. "There are many hundreds of thousands of acres of barren grasslands in what was prior to mining forest land," he said. "There's very little cattle infrastructure in the mountains, not enough to justify the amount of grasslands that have been created. A higher and better use would be to return them to forest land." The coal industry supports reforestation, said Luke Popovich, spokesman for the National Mining Association in Washington. Preparing the mine land for reforestation is no more expensive than compacting the ground and turning it into grasslands, Popovich said. "I don't sense there's been any industry pushback," he said. "It seems to be simply what is a reasonable for the typography and the terrain. For a lot of that area, hardwood stands would make sense." ___ On the Net: UN Environment Programme: Appalachian Coal Country Watershed Team:
http://www.unep.ch/etb/
http://www.accwt.org/
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor