|
The op-ed piece was part of Cameron's maneuvering to pressure Brown into calling early elections. Public anger has been fueled by revelations of how lawmakers used public money to clean a moat, buy plasma screen TVs and repair swimming pools. Most claims were legally valid under Parliament's lax rules, but some
-- like claiming interest payments for mortgages that were already paid off
-- could spark criminal charges. The stricken lawmakers are pushing for changes unprecedented in the nation's history, even though many ideas have been discussed before, such as changing Britain's electoral system
-- which favors the two major parties -- to one that apportions House of Commons seats based on each party's share of the national vote.
Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg described Cameron's ideas as a "nip and tuck" solution. "I think David Cameron's ideas are fine as far as they go -- but they don't go far enough," he told GMTV, a British morning television program. Clegg said huge amounts of power were given to Britain's two main parties. "It seems to me that we want to have governments in power in our name who really have to get a proper mandate from us, otherwise what right do they have to run things on our behalf?" Clegg said.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor