|
One of the key issues is what legal advice Bank of America received regarding disclosing the amount of the bonuses
-- which could have totaled up to $5.8 billion -- to shareholders before their vote on the companies' merger. The Securities and Exchange Commission sued Bank of America in August, alleging that it failed to tell shareholders that it had authorized Merrill to pay that amount in 2008 even though the investment bank had suffered the stunning loss. The terms of the bank's takeover of Merrill, including the bonus payments, were laid out in documents prepared by outside attorneys for the two companies. Bank of America was represented in the negotiations by the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Merrill's counsel was Shearman & Sterling. The attorneys were mainly responsible for drafting Bank of America's disclosure filings to the SEC. Also scheduled to testify at Tuesday's hearing is Brian Moynihan, who took over as Bank of America general counsel after Mayopoulos' departure and is president of consumer and small-business banking, and board members Charles "Chad" Gifford and Thomas May.
Moynihan is considered by analysts to be a leading candidate to replace Lewis. "... Throughout the deliberations around our acquisition of Merrill Lynch, Bank of America acted in good faith and consulted with one of the premier law firms in the United States to work through a very difficult issue," Moynihan says in his prepared testimony. He also maintains that despite the merger having been affected by the distress of the financial crisis, it turned out to be a success that has benefited Bank of America customers and U.S. taxpayers. The House panel's scrutiny follows months of legal wrangling over the deal. In September, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo subpoenaed five members of Bank of America's board as part of an investigation into the Merrill takeover. Seven directors have resigned from the board since shareholders replaced Lewis as chairman in April. Bank of America had settled the SEC's separate case over disclosures of the Merrill bonuses in September, but a federal judge said the $33 million settlement accord was unfair and needlessly penalized the bank's shareholders. The judge has ordered the case to go to trial on Feb. 1.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor