|  The process of developing the budget began with two mornings of 
			budget hearings. The committee then began the task of reviewing 
			anticipated revenues, projected expenses, special requests and how 
			to make those ends meet. This year's budget process, begun in 
			early August, went into extra innings with a number of special 
			finance meetings and dozens of extra hours spent sorting out how to 
			fit increasing costs into lesser revenues.  Voting yes to approve the proposed budget were Rick Aylesworth, 
			Terry Carlton, Bob Farmer, Gloria Luster, Bill Martin, Chuck Ruben, 
			Jan Schumacher and T.W. Werth. 
			 Voting no were John Stewart, Kevin Bateman, David Hepler and Pat 
			O'Neill. All of the tax levy funds were 
			approved, with the following votes: 
				
				General fund, 
				$810,23710-2; Hepler and O'Neill voted no.
				Liability 
				insurance, $170,00012-0
				Health department, 
				$370,87012-0
				Illinois Municipal 
				Retirement, $812,50012-0
				County highway, 
				$379,145 12-0
				County bridge, 
				$100,0007-5; Stewart, Werth, Bateman, Hepler and O'Neill voted no.
 (See discussion below.)
				Highway matching 
				tax, $199,00012-0
				Ambulance service, 
				$150,00012-0
				Tuberculosis, 
				$55,39812-0
				Senior citizens 
				tax, $80,00012-0
				Cooperative Extension Service, $103,0009-3; Stewart, Bateman, Hepler voted no.
 Ruben thanked the finance committee for their hard work in 
			developing the budget. He then reminded the board that due to the 
			tax cap, this set of figures is fixed to the total levy. "So, if you 
			want to raise one, you've got to pick another one to drop," he said. 
			"That's the only way it works unless we can change the PTEL law." 
			 During the evening a motion to remove the GIS coordinator from 
			the budget was made by Pat O'Neill and seconded by David Hepler.  O'Neill said that last week he had had phone calls opposing this 
			expense. Bill Martin said that the reason the position was placed in the 
			budget right now was in case the work that is being done on GIS 
			comes to the point that we can look at having a person to do our 
			GIS. It would be important to have this in place, rather than to 
			come back and try to do this in the middle of the year, he said. John Stewart said that this week he called county engineer Bret 
			Aukamp, who has carried the work on the GIS to this point. "It's not 
			in his job description to be doing this," Stewart said. "He's gone 
			above and beyond."  Stewart said that he hoped the GIS position could be combined 
			with a planning and zoning position. "We've already put about $200,000 in this system," Stewart said. 
			From his own experience building wind farms, where the technology is 
			used heavily, he could see it would have many other uses. "It's 
			something that is going to be needed in the near future if we're 
			going to move forward," he said.  The motion to remove the GIS position failed with a vote of 10-2. Another area of concern to board members was 
			the reduction of funding to the bridge fund. If fully funded, the 
			bridge fund would have been at $200,000 this year. While intended as 
			a temporary measure to cover general fund operating costs, this is 
			the seventh year of taking from that levy. It began with the 
			2003-2004 budget, when $0 was levied. A total of $1.2 million has 
			been diverted in the past six years.  The matching tax fund, which is also used by the highway 
			department for infrastructure projects, was reduced during recent 
			years for the same purpose. That fund has been restored. The health department was also reduced during past years, but 
			their funding has been fully restored this year. 
			[to top of second column] 
			
			 | 
 
Aukamp was able to make up for some of the losses to the highway department in a 
number of ways, including searching for and receiving outside funding for a 
number of projects. However, in September he wrote the finance committee to 
remind the committee: "If the infrastructure funds are routinely used to balance 
an annual operating budget, we will quickly be outpaced by the deferred cost of 
repair to our bridges and roadways." 
			 He detailed the current conditions of the county bridges and 
			projected into the future. Five bridges are now on a special 
			inspection list, two inspected monthly. Four bridges have been 
			targeted for replacement or closure in the next few years; nine have 
			significant issues that cannot be economically repaired.  Basic maintenance is valuable in prolonging the lifespan of 
			bridges. "For example, it is much cheaper to prevent rust by 
			painting steel beams than it is to ignore the problem until the 
			beams need to be fully replaced," he said.  
			 In addition to the annual $100,000 to $200,000 needed for 
			projects, which includes culverts, there is $500,000 worth of 
			specialized projects in the next five years involving bridge 
			painting and overlays. The result of postponing repairs has its price. Each year the 
			weight limit postings are adjusted on various bridges, and one 
			bridge has already been closed in Sheridan Township; some others are 
			down to 3-ton limits. "Without adequate funding, we will simply not 
			have the money to repair or replace these bridges," he said. Stewart credited Aukamp for his efforts on covering for the funds 
			taken away temporarily but said that it is time to come up with a 
			plan to return those funds.  Ruben has said the same. At the close of the meeting, board chairman Carlton discussed a 
			new initiative that would continue to look for ways to cut costs and 
			increase revenues. The Tax Reduction Task Force is a short-term, 
			six-month task force being formed with the aim to reduce taxes. "One of its targets, Mr. Stewart, is (to look for) how to reduce 
			taxes, change our levies and fill that road and bridge fund back up, 
			but also how to maintain or lower our tax rate for Logan County," 
			Carlton said. "The task force would gather and provide data to 
			substantiate their findings. I think we really need to have a good 
			grip on this." This could be done by identifying ways to increase revenues or by 
			reducing operational costs. That should be our goal, Carlton said. 
			Some of these things we're already doing in part. Ideas could 
			include but are not limited to: co-payment on health insurance, 
			opt-out insurance program, variable part-time work force, outsource 
			services, voluntary severance incentive program, and creating an 
			administrative services group that would include IT, GIS (maybe 
			putting together GIS and zoning), central purchasing and payroll, he 
			said.  
			 Options include increasing the public safety tax and reducing the 
			property tax by the equivalent. A comprehensive overview of county-owned equipment and contracts 
			would be performed. All existing office equipment and related 
			contracts would need to be evaluated, including the phone system. The information would be compiled in a report and evaluated. 
			"This report with recommendations would need to be done before we 
			establish our tax rate next spring," Carlton said. He appointed Rick Aylesworth as chair, Chuck Ruben, Dave Hepler, 
			Jan Schumacher, and Kevin Bateman and himself to the task force.  A special note to the public, government entities and county 
			agencies:  On Thursday, beginning at noon, a special lunch-hour presentation 
			of the Logan County GIS has been scheduled to show some of its many 
			uses and how it might help you. The presentation will take place in 
			the boardroom on the first floor at the Logan County Courthouse. 
            [By 
			JAN YOUNGQUIST] 
			Past related article |