| 
				
					
						
							
								 It was a compact bid that kept 90 percent of the 
								athletes within 15 minutes of their venues, and 
								used existing or temporary venues that wouldn't 
								burden the city with white elephants. It was a 
								dazzling setting on picturesque Lake Michigan, a 
								major city that doesn't have major attitude. 
								Best of all, it had government support all the 
								way up to the White House. So much so that 
								President Barack Obama found time in his busy 
								schedule to come to Copenhagen to lobby in 
								person for the 2016 Olympics -- flying overnight, 
								no less. "This was," acting U.S. Olympic Committee CEO 
								Stephanie Streeter said, "the strongest bid 
								we've had. Ever." 
								
								 And yet Chicago was gone after the first 
								round Friday, a worse showing than New York's 
								bid for the 2012 Games four years ago. Even 
								Tokyo, whose bid barely generated any mention in 
								the days before the vote, beat the Americans. "Stunned" and "shocked" were the words heard 
								most often, from IOC members and the Chicago 
								contingent. "Either it was tactical voting, or a lot of 
								people decided not to vote for Chicago whatever 
								happened," IOC executive board member Gerhard 
								Heiberg said. "Nobody knows, but everybody is in 
								a state of shock. Nobody believes it. I'm very 
								sorry about it. We will have to spend some time 
								evaluating what happened." As will the Americans. Sure, a large part of their defeat was the 
								appeal of eventual winner Rio de Janeiro. The 
								Olympics have never been in South America, and 
								the Brazilians were incredibly passionate and 
								enthusiastic in their appeals for the games. But there was also an undeniable backlash 
								against any number of things American, from 
								hassling visitors at the borders to money 
								squabbles -- even that quickie visit by the 
								president. "They realize that apparently they have a 
								problem," Denis Oswald, a member of the 
								International Olympic Committee's executive 
								board, said. "We want them to be fully part of 
								the family and they probably have to take some 
								steps." Some people, though, just don't like the way 
								Americans do things. One IOC member, Syed Shahid Ali of Pakistan, 
								told Obama that foreigners "can go through a 
								rather harrowing experience" getting into the 
								United States and asked how he intended to deal 
								with that when thousands of people come for the 
								2016 games. 
								
								 Obama replied that "America, at its best, is 
								open to the world," and the presentation ended 
								with no further questions. "This is an easy way for countries to express 
								resentment toward us, as a superpower, without 
								suffering any consequences, like having their 
								foreign aid cut off or their weapons programs 
								cut off," said Doug Logan, CEO of USA Track and 
								Field. "It's an easy way for them to express a 
								great amount of displeasure." There are other geopolitical factors at play, 
								too. Rio repeatedly referred to the "imbalance" 
								of the games being held -- often -- in North 
								America, Europe and Asia, yet never in South 
								America, and it was tough for IOC members to 
								ignore. There also might have been some members 
								who tossed their votes to Tokyo in the first 
								round, assuming Chicago would get through and 
								not wanting the Japanese to be horribly 
								embarrassed. "The whole thing doesn't make sense other 
								than there has been a stupid bloc vote," senior 
								Australian member Kevan Gosper said. "To have 
								the president of the United States and his wife 
								personally appear, then this should happen in 
								the first round, is awful and totally 
								undeserving." 
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			Even Obama's presence may have hurt with a few IOC members. While 
			many rushed to meet the president and the first lady after they left 
			the session hall, not everyone was so enthralled. He was in town 
			only five hours, then hurried back to Washington. "It can be that some IOC members see it as a lack of respect," 
			said Kai Holm, a former IOC member from Denmark. But the Americans -- the USOC, at least -- also have to shoulder 
			some of the blame. A testy relationship between the IOC and USOC is almost 
			ingrained. The IOC needs the United States -- its companies and 
			broadcasters provide the largest share of their revenues -- and 
			resents that it does. That the USOC spent many years acting as if it 
			was above the rest of the group only worsened things. When the vote-buying scandal in Salt Lake City's winning campaign 
			for the 2002 Winter Games broke, IOC members took the brunt of the 
			criticism -- then-president Juan Antonio Samaranch was even called 
			before Congress -- and the USOC underwent a period of upheaval that 
			was felt domestically and internationally. 
			 The USOC has done a lot of work, particularly in the last four 
			years, to re-engage internationally, letting the IOC know it wants 
			to be interested partners, not overseers. But some bad feelings 
			linger, magnifying any missteps. Other Olympic committees have 
			explored the possibility of starting their own TV networks, yet it 
			threatened to derail the Chicago bid when the USOC announced plans 
			this year. Not to mention squandering any good will the USOC had 
			built up when chairman Larry Probst and Streeter managed to work out 
			a compromise on the long-simmering revenue sharing dispute earlier. And after years of relatively stable leadership, the USOC had a 
			messy transition when Jim Scherr, a former Olympic wrestler who was 
			well-liked in the movement, was dumped in March and replaced by 
			Streeter. "I think the revenue-sharing issue not being completely resolved 
			was a factor," Scherr said. "Also, the desire for the IOC to go to 
			South America and the fact that Rio has been in the process for four 
			more years than Chicago was. They had a leg up from Day One." And now they have the games. And the Americans are looking for 
			answers. "It's a strong bid," said Bob Ctvrtlik, a former IOC member who 
			is now the USOC's vice chair of international relations. "If you 
			went around and asked the IOC members, I think they'd say it's a 
			strong bid, too." If only that was all that mattered in the game of Olympic 
			politics. 
              
              [Associated Press] 
              
              AP Sports Writers Steve Wilson in London and Eddie Pells in 
			Colorado Springs, Colo., contributed to this report. 
            Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This 
				material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or 
				redistributed. 
            
			 |