| Approximately 10 people showed up for the meeting and only five of 
			those spoke: local businessman Eric Notto of Notto Technologies and 
			Consultants, residents Sandy Johnson and Charles Anderson, CITV-5 
			representative Celeste Rogers, and Comcast representative Libby 
			Stehn. Notto was the first to speak, saying that when he opened his 
			business at 503 Woodlawn, he initially went with Verizon for phone 
			service. However, he soon became dissatisfied with the cost of the 
			service and looked into doing a bundle of services from Comcast that 
			included phone lines as well as Internet.  His experience with Comcast has been quite positive, and he said 
			he was very well pleased with the cost compared to Verizon.  Notto also read letters from Midwest Records Storage and Heritage 
			Packaging that again praised Comcast for their services to their 
			businesses.  When Celeste Rogers took the podium, she spoke about the unused 
			channels that are seemingly available for more public access 
			television. She said that in the lower 100 channels, there are 31 
			going unused, and that is an opportunity for more public access.  As she spoke about this, questions came from the council 
			regarding CITV-5's use of the local origination channel.  It was asked what amount of time was available on Channel 5 for 
			public access, and according to Rogers, the majority of the prime 
			daytime and evening hours are under contract to CITV-5. Rogers said 
			that right now the time slots that would be available are during the 
			midnight hours: late night to early morning.  Mayor Keith Snyder asked specifically what the proper mix of 
			local origination and public access would be on that channel, and 
			Rogers responded that she really didn't know that there was any 
			established proper mix.  Rogers did promote the idea that there needs to be more airing of 
			city council activities, such as the Tuesday night workshop 
			meetings, and she said that the contract between CITV-5 and Comcast 
			could be discussed to see if those items could be added as public 
			access.  As the evening progressed, several subjects were addressed, 
			including the inability to get through to customer service via the 
			company's 800 number.  Alderwomen Joni Tibbs and Melody Anderson both commented about 
			the difficulty in reaching customer service. Anderson referred to 
			going through "16 different phone trees, getting a different person 
			each time they called and a different story from each person talked 
			to." She said that this was a complaint she had heard from her 
			constituents.  She added that she had also been told that those who take the 
			time to travel to the local office get better responses and more 
			help with their problems. The problem there, though, is that some 
			people can't go to that office, and it appears they can't call 
			there.  It was also mentioned later that in many cases, even though the 
			local office is willing to help, they too have to go through 
			corporate to get a service call logged.  When local resident Sandy Johnson spoke about Comcast, she too 
			expressed a desire to see more of the city council meetings aired, 
			as well as county board meetings.  It later came out that CITV-5 used to air the county meetings, 
			but they were not public access then. The meetings were provided 
			through CITV-5 and paid for by various program sponsors.  Johnson also commented on repair work the company had done, 
			saying that they had left a cable running on the ground across her 
			back lawn for nearly a month before coming to bury it.  Her final comment addressed the cost of the service. She said 
			that it was a concern to her as a senior citizen that rates are 
			continually rising, making it less and less affordable for her to 
			have the service at all.  Charles Anderson addressed another problem that he feels is 
			prevalent for seniors, and that is the lack of proper education on 
			how to deal with the new digital equipment that the company is 
			switching to.  He said he felt like the installers could have spent more time 
			showing him how to use the multifunctional remote control and 
			coordinating how to get the TV and the digital boxes all to work.
			 Chuck Conzo, city treasurer, asked Anderson whether or not the 
			instruction manual that came with the box and remote was helpful to 
			him, and Anderson replied that he did not receive an instruction 
			manual.  
			[to top of second column] | 
 
 
			 When Stehn took the podium, she began by commenting on Comcast's 
			community involvement, noting support the company has given to 
			Community Action through Comcast Cares as well as to the public 
			schools.  She said she had taken note of all the concerns of the council 
			and the citizens, and she was going to address all of them.  Among other things, she said there was a possibility that Comcast 
			might be able to offer a technology workshop for the senior 
			community to help them understand the workings of the new digital 
			systems.  When asked about the public access programming, she said it would 
			have to be worked out with CITV-5, but that it was possible that the 
			Tuesday night meetings could be aired. She said she would look into 
			that, and Alderwoman Anderson asked when.  Anderson commented that Stehn had said in the past that it could 
			be looked into and discussed, but it didn't happen. This time she 
			wants a specific timeline.  When Rogers had spoken earlier in the evening, she said there 
			were 31 channels not being used in the lower 100. Stehn was asked 
			about that, and she indicated that even though the numbers weren't 
			being used, the bandwidth of those 31 channels had been assigned to 
			other places.  Alderman Tom O'Donohue then commented that what she was saying 
			was that Channel 5 is the only one available, to which Stehn said 
			that right now that is correct.  Anderson then asked if another channel could be made available 
			for public access. Stehn said it was something that could be 
			discussed, and O'Donohue asked for a timeline there as well.  Stehn said she would try to be in contact with the mayor within 
			the next week or so.  Stehn also addressed the desire of the community to have a local 
			service contact number. She said that for the company, 800 numbers 
			were more cost-efficient. She said that while it might not be the 
			best answer for the community, it was what the company felt worked 
			best for the business. She added that she would provide each council member 
			with her direct phone number, and anytime they or their constituents 
			had a problem with the customer service department, they were to 
			call her directly.  Other comments that came out during the meeting included problems 
			with Internet outages and an inconsistency in the volume between 
			channels and also between programs and commercials.  Stehn said that some of these problems were merely technical 
			issues that needed to be addressed, especially in the problem with 
			the volume. She added that she would report this and see if 
			something can be done in the very near future.  In the end, Snyder went through a list of issues that that had 
			come from the constituents, various letters that had been received 
			and council members' comments and said that he would expect to hear 
			back from Stehn on all the issues.  Snyder said specifically that he wanted a better answer in regard 
			to having a local service number. He commented: "I understand that it is better for your business, 
			but these are our local citizens asking for that, and I think you 
			can give us a better answer."  [By NILA SMITH] |