|
In their July 19 suit, they called for closing the two locks and placing screens, nets and other devices at selected points as temporary measures. They requested an order that the corps speed up a promised study of ways to permanently separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi River watersheds. The suit contends the corps' position on the locks is arbitrary and accuses the agency of operating a nuisance. Dow acknowledged in his 61-page opinion that a carp invasion might do great harm to the lakes but said the states had not shown it was likely or imminent. In fact, he said, the evidence suggests that flooding and economic damage to barge operators and businesses that rely on them would "outweigh the more remote harm associated with the possibility that Asian carp will breach the electronic barriers in significant numbers, swim through the sluice gates and locks, and establish a sustainable population in Lake Michigan." Chicago business groups urged Michigan and the other states to drop the lawsuit, saying there was little chance it would prevail. "Spending precious time and money on legal action is diverting resources from control and research efforts," said Mark Biel, president of the UnLock Our Jobs Coalition. Environmental groups acknowledged prospects for closing the locks were slim and called for severing ties between the Great Lakes and Mississippi basins. "This decision doesn't have any bearing on the main issue, which is that separating the systems is the only way to solve this problem permanently," said Joel Brammeier, president of the Alliance for the Great Lakes.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor