|  Church officials announced they would seek co-sponsorship of the 
			Illinois State Historical Society in erecting a historical marker at 
			the site of their 1857 church, now a parking lot next to the Lincoln 
			Public Library, to commemorate their church's alleged connection to 
			Abe. The ISHS requires at least one primary source before endorsing 
			an historical marker. A primary source is one that is contemporary 
			with a given event: for example, a court document, newspaper report 
			or letter. When I read news reports of the plan for the historical marker, I 
			simply pointed out that no primary source evidence had been produced 
			to show that Mr. Lincoln had practiced law in that church in 1857. 
			Church officials then indicated their people would continue 
			searching for an appropriate primary source. I told church officials 
			I hoped they would find primary source evidence to prove their case. 
			As a native Lincolnite, I advocate identifying and commemorating 
			every possible connection the city has to its famous namesake, but I 
			also believe in the need to distinguish between fact and myth. In 
			July 2008 Ron Keller, a Lincoln College professor and laureate of 
			the Lincoln Academy of Illinois, independently submitted the "Abe in 
			church" question to PBS' "History Detectives."  
			
			 By late summer of 2009, I had not heard of any new developments, 
			so I decided to conduct my own research on this topic. I have 
			academic interests in Illinois history and Abraham Lincoln. The 1857 fall term of the 8th Judicial Circuit Court was 
			allegedly held in the building that became the Lincoln Christian 
			Church, since a fire had destroyed the Logan County Courthouse 
			earlier in the spring. Lawrence B. Stringer, whose two-volume "1911 
			History of Logan County" includes a chapter on Abraham Lincoln, 
			stated his belief that the circuit court was held in the Christian 
			Church while the new courthouse was being built (vol. 1, p. 162). 
			Stringer had spoken at the church plaque's dedication (date unknown 
			but within the five years preceding Stringer's death in 1942), and 
			in 2007 church officials cited Stringer's involvement as further 
			evidence that Mr. Lincoln had practiced law in their church. Last August when I researched this topic, I first focused on 
			information that historian James T. Hickey had published in 1953. A 
			protege of Stringer, Hickey was for many years the curator of the 
			Lincoln Collection of the Illinois State Historical Library (now the 
			Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library) and had taught a course in the 
			life of Lincoln at Lincoln College (I took that course in 1960-61).
			 Hickey had discovered that the contractor who constructed the 
			building that became the Lincoln Christian Church in 1857 had rented 
			it to the Logan County Board before turning over the deed to church 
			members. Hickey said the 1857 fall court term ran from Sept. 21 
			through Oct. 2. He also found a "bill of particulars" on a case that 
			was heard in the church while it was allegedly serving as a 
			courtroom in the fall of 1857. The document is in Lincoln's 
			handwriting and concerns his firm handling the case of Steigleman 
			and Johnson v. Many A. Brace and William H. Young. Regardless, Hickey contended that Lincoln was probably not in his 
			first namesake town during the 1857 fall term of the circuit court, 
			because he was then for several weeks deeply involved in the major 
			Effie Afton case in Chicago. In Hickey's view, the Steigleman case 
			was handled by Lincoln's Springfield partner, William H. Herndon. 
			Hickey wrote, "There just is no way that Lincoln could have taken 
			part in the case in Lincoln and the railroad case in Chicago at the 
			same time." When I looked online at The Lincoln Log (authoritative account of 
			Lincoln's daily activities), I discovered that the Effie Afton case 
			was concluded on Sept. 24, 1857, and that Abe was back in 
			Springfield on the 26th. I then wrote to Dr. Bryon Andreasen, 
			research historian of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, to 
			ask for assistance in determining whether the court records for 
			Steigleman date to the period from the last few days of September 
			through the first two days of October, when Abraham Lincoln had 
			returned to Springfield and thus would have been able to attend 
			court in Lincoln. In his reply letter of Aug. 27, 2009, Andreasen said Steigleman 
			was heard and decided on Sept. 21, 1857, in favor of the plaintiffs, 
			represented by the law firm of Lincoln & Herndon: "The plaintiffs' 
			petition (what Jim Hickey must have been referring to as the "Bill 
			of Particulars") is in Lincoln's hand. It would have had to have 
			been written and filed before commencement of the Fall Term in 
			September 1857 in order for notice and process to have been served 
			on the defendants. It would not have been necessary for Lincoln to 
			have personally been in attendance on September 21. Hickey was no 
			doubt correct in his supposition that Herndon (or some other proxy) 
			attended the September 21st proceeding, since Lincoln is documented 
			to have still been in Chicago trying the Effie Afton case on that 
			date."  
			 Hickey's 1953 determination that Abe did not practice law in the 
			Lincoln Christian Church was published in the Lincoln Courier, where 
			undoubtedly members of that church saw it. Then perhaps they 
			promptly removed the plaque because of its inaccuracy. Using the online "Law Practice of Abraham Lincoln," I then 
			focused on another case in the 1857 Logan County Circuit Court 
			involving the firm of Lincoln & Herndon: Dalby v. St. Louis, Alton, 
			& Chicago RR. Joseph A. Dalby had sued the railroad for injuries he 
			had received while scuffling with railroad employees over the price 
			of a fare for his family's passage from Elkhart to Lincoln, Ill. The 
			firm of Lincoln & Herndon represented Dalby, but Lincoln was in 
			Chicago during this case also. Court records show that attorney 
			Samuel C. Parks of Lincoln aided Herndon. Information relating to 
			the Dalby case proved to be the smoking gun for Stringer's role in 
			the "Abe in church" question. 
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			In his "1911 History," Stringer claimed that the judge's 
			instructions to the jury in the Dalby case were written by Lincoln 
			(vol. 1, p. 219). Stringer's book even includes a facsimile of part 
			of those instructions (vol. 1, between pp. 368-69). Through 
			additional research, I discovered that historian John J. Duff (d. 
			1961) in "A. Lincoln, Prairie Lawyer" (1960) pointed out that 
			Stringer had erred in identifying the author of the jury 
			instructions. Duff wrote: "One does not have to be a handwriting 
			expert to see that there is no resemblance whatever between the 
			facsimile of the instructions and Lincoln's unmistakable 
			handwriting. (The writing clearly is that of David Davis. The 
			Illinois State Historical Library has some of the original papers in 
			this case, and the Judge's hand is much in evidence.) Beveridge 
			[early 20th century Lincoln biographer], citing Stringer, indicates 
			that Lincoln tried the case in the lower [circuit] court. As a 
			matter of fact, at the time of the trial in Logan County, Lincoln 
			was in Chicago, trying the Effie Afton case" (p. 270). Undoubtedly Stringer's error in thinking that Abraham Lincoln had 
			written the judge's instructions to the jury was the basis for 
			Stringer's mistaken belief that Lincoln had practiced law in the 
			Lincoln Christian Church in 1857. Further, historian William D. 
			Beard pointed out that Stringer's error had led several well-known 
			20th-century Lincoln biographers and historians to make the faulty 
			inference that Lincoln had practiced law in his first namesake town 
			that term. The railroad lost the case in circuit court and appealed in the 
			Illinois Supreme Court. According to Beard, Herndon -- not Lincoln 
			(as other Lincoln experts had believed) -- handled the appeal 
			proceedings in which the higher court upheld the lower court's 
			judgment. The Dalby case became one of the most significant cases of 
			the firm of Lincoln & Herndon for setting influential precedence. Curiously, Abraham Lincoln may have passed through his first 
			namesake town on the day the Dalby case was concluded in the circuit 
			court. According to The Lincoln Log, on Sept. 24, 1857, the Effie 
			Afton trial ended in favor of the railroad company, Lincoln's 
			client. Also, according to The Lincoln Log, Abraham Lincoln, as 
			noted above, was back in Springfield on Sept. 26. The Lincoln Log 
			has no entry for Sept. 25, but it follows that Lincoln would have 
			traveled by train toward Springfield through his first namesake town 
			on that date -- the very date on which the Dalby case was decided in 
			favor of his firm's client.  
			
			 I searched for references to Mr. Lincoln's activity for Sept. 25, 
			1857, in central Illinois newspapers. Apparently no newspapers of 
			Lincoln, Ill., for 1857 survive. The Bloomington Daily Pantagraph 
			and the Springfield Illinois State-Register for that time do not 
			contain any relevant information. Court documents show that Mr. Lincoln had participated in the 
			circuit court at Lincoln in the spring of 1858 while a new 
			courthouse was being built. By then, a temporary building had been 
			built for the Logan County Court near the new courthouse 
			construction, and the 1858 spring term of the circuit court was 
			probably conducted there also because a courtroom in those days 
			sometimes served more than one purpose, but I know of no efforts to 
			find a primary source to prove that in this particular situation. In 2007, Lincoln Christian Church officials indicated their 
			belief that the circuit court's 1858 spring term might also have 
			been held in their 1857 church. Again, I must say, "Show me some 
			primary source evidence supporting that speculation." [By D. LEIGH HENSON] Henson 
			is professor emeritus of English from Missouri State University, 
			Springfield, Mo. He earned a doctorate from Illinois State 
			University.  
			
			dlhenson@missouristate.edu  
			
			http://english.missouristate.edu/faculty/henson.html  
			
			http://www.facebook.com/leigh.henson  ___ For a photo of the Lincoln Christian Church (constructed 1857), 
			as it was being dismantled in 1902 or 1903, the text of the lost 
			church plaque, and other information related to the question of Abe 
			practicing law in this church, see
			
			http://findinglincolnillinois.com/churches.html#christianchurch.
 For more information about and photos of Lawrence B. Stringer, 
			James T. Hickey and other historians who have published on the 
			history of Lincoln and Logan County, Ill., see
			
			http://findinglincolnillinois.com/historians.html. The Law Practice of Abraham Lincoln, 2nd ed.:http://www.lawpracticeofabrahamlincoln.org/
 Web site of the Lincoln Christian Church:http://www.lincolnchristianchurch.org/
 Articles (2007) on the Lincoln 
			Christian Church's announcement of its alleged connection to Abraham 
			Lincoln: "Church researching a new connection to 
			Abraham Lincoln,"
			
			http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2007/Sep/19/News/today091907_c.htm.
 Roland Klose, "Missing Lincoln link: 
			The jury's still out on area church's claims, professor says," 
			Illinois Times, Sept. 26, 2007
			
			http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-4443-missing-lincoln-link.html.
 
			
			 
			
			 |