|
The tests, he said, turn up impurities about 1 percent to 3 percent of the time, and make it nearly impossible to unknowingly inject adulterated medications. "You'd have to be an idiot," Neumeister said, adding that he was speaking generally about the testing procedure, rather than the situation at the Kreitchman PET Center. "It's like being pregnant
-- either you are, or you're not; it's very clear, there's no gray zone, no ambiguity." If an impure tracer is used, any resulting scientific studies "are compromised," Neumeister said. It also might affect a person's health condition in unpredictable ways, like inducing allergies or worsening depression. "It's not that you're killing a patient," he said, but, "you might be exposing your patient to various other levels of danger." Among the problems at Columbia cited by the FDA were a failure to set up appropriate sterility tests, poor record keeping and lapses in training. "If you're approved by the FDA to administer compounds that pass purity tests, and then inject substances that do not meet quality assurance regulations, you are breaking a sacred trust," said Dr. Nancy C. Andreasen, a former editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Psychiatry. Andreasen, of the University of Iowa, an internationally known PET researcher, said the resulting studies are often used to determine dosages for treating patients in ordinary clinical settings. "And if a study is messed up, you could be overmedicating or undermedicating a patient," she said.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor