The leading candidates for the state's highest office are Democratic
Gov. Pat Quinn and state Sen. Bill Brady, R-Bloomington. Voters
won't have to decide their pick for governor until November, but
both sides are showcasing their contribution totals, if not their
donor lists, as a sign of political strength.
(See related article: Quinn, Brady
cash dash unique)
The Quinn campaign and the Brady campaign had already released
preliminary fundraising numbers. Both campaigns indicated that as of
June 30, they had $2.3 million to spend on the race.
But there is still a long way to go, according to David Morrison,
deputy director of the watchdog Illinois Campaign for Political
Reform.
Morrison said some influential interest groups could wait until
they have a clearer idea which candidate best aligns with their
goals, or is most likely to win, before throwing their money and
support behind him.
"There are a lot of big-money interest groups -- the doctors, the
trial lawyers, the bankers -- who will raise a lot of money and kind
of keep it sitting on the sideline. And they may not commit to
giving checks to people until September, October, late October," he
said.
Bill Olson, president of the Associated Beer Distributors of
Illinois, said they will ask their members which candidate the
association should back. He added that sometimes in tight races, the
association will back both candidates.
The beer distributors' political action committee, or lobbying
arm, supported both Brady and Quinn in their primary elections.
While Olson said his association does not endorse candidates, it
will financially back candidates based on a combination of previous
votes on legislation, surveys and members' wishes.
"(Our PAC money) is not our association's money. It is our
members' money that they give to us to support candidates. And we
ask them if they have an interest in any particular candidate that
they want for us to consider supporting. ... So that's also part of
our process," he said.
[to top of second column] |
Morrison said some lobbying associations will back opposing
candidates to ensure their interests are covered no matter what
happens in a close election.
"There are absolutely interest groups, political action
committees, individuals who are more concerned with having access to
whoever is in power than they are supporting an ideological
position," he said.
Olson said if both candidates fit certain prerequisites, he
doesn't see a problem with supporting both candidates.
He also denies the premise from some critics that interest groups
are just trying to purchase influence with politicians.
"The lobbyists really aren't part of the (legislative) process.
We don't vote," Olson said. "If there's any campaign reform that
should be looked at, I would say that it's important that the
legislators, candidates themselves look at putting caps on how much
money they will receive."
This November marks the last election in Illinois where
candidates can receive uncapped campaign contributions.
A new law inked by Quinn last December will impose the state's
first contribution limits starting in 2011.
[Illinois
Statehouse News; By KEVIN LEE]
|