|
"I'm looking at five weeks of summer where I feel I have the competitive advantage to maximize the revenue of the movie," Fellman said Wednesday. "While I knew this was going to be a tough weekend because of the commitments many female fans of the movie have, I'm happy to walk away from it with $51 million. Let's see what happens when the girls go out during the week. On a female-driven movie, mid-weeks always overperform." Dergarabedian also suspects negative word of mouth through social networks also may have hurt the movie beyond the critical trashing it took. "Sex and the City 2" received just 16 percent positive reviews on the Rotten Tomatoes website, compared to 49 percent for the original. "Women trust each other," he said. Plus, it's a sequel, so the four years of pent-up excitement for the original film following the TV series finale no longer exists. "I think with `Sex and the City,' the first one was such a novelty: the big-screen manifestation of the characters they love so much," Dergarabedian said. "Sometimes with a sequel, it's a little bit of diminishing returns." As for the movie's negative critical reception, Fellman said: "Great reviews are always good but this is a franchise where we have such a strong fan base. ... Yes, the reviews were unfavorable to the point where I totally disagree with most of them, but the audience likes it and the girls are going to go." So is there really a chance for a "Sex and the City 3"? "Personally, I'd love to see it," Fellman said. "We're sitting back and watching what happens."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor