|
EasyJet, which lost 55-75 million pounds because of the airspace closure, is one of a number of airlines seeking compensation from governments. Andrew Haines, the chief executive of Britain's Civil Aviation Authority, defended the decision to close airspace, saying aircraft manufacturers did not provide any information about what was a safe level of ash. Few doubt that flying directly into the plumes of a volcano could disable an aircraft. But it remains unclear whether the abrasive particles present a hazard to the jets outside the immediate area of the volcanic plume, once it is dispersed by high-altitude winds. "Until we could get a clear assessment, we were absolutely justified in taking the actions we took," said Haines. "Otherwise, it would have been a case of keeping our fingers crossed and I don't think anyone would have thanked us for that." He welcomed easyJet's testing of new technology as an important contribution from the industry to solve the problem. "I very much hope this is a sign that the industry is going to play its part ... rather than pretending the risk doesn't exist," he said. Fred Prata, the scientist behind the devices, has been developing the technology for some 20 years, carrying out tests near erupting volcanoes around the world. EasyJet plans to carry out its first test flight on an Airbus A340 test plane within two months. Depending on the results of those tests, it will then move to the wider trial on its own aircraft.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor