|
"The Senate bill departs from long-standing federal policy by authorizing tax subsidies to help tens of millions of Americans buy private health plans that could cover abortion on demand," said Johnson. "Anyone enrolling in such plan would be required to make separate payments into an abortion fund." But Timothy Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University, analyzed the two bills and concluded the only difference is an administrative technicality. "What Stupak says is you have to buy a separate policy, and what Nelson says is you have to write two checks," said Jost. "There's no public funding of abortion." And people who don't want to pay for other people's abortions wouldn't be forced to do so, Jost added. They could simply pick a plan that doesn't cover it. Q: What are the odds that health plans which don't cover abortion would be available? A: There would definitely be a demand for them, and not just from people with moral objections. Single men and older women would have no reason to pay an extra premium for abortion coverage. "Because this is such a hot political issue, my expectation is that insurance companies would definitely offer it both ways," said Robert Laszewski, a former health insurance executive turned consultant. Abortion coverage is now widely available through workplace health plans, but many women who have abortions pay out of pocket instead of using their insurance. Q: Don't abortion opponents have other concerns about the bill? A: A major one has to do with $11 billion that Obama wants to pump into community health centers serving low-income people and the uninsured. As the bill is currently written, those funds are not explicitly covered by the Hyde amendment. White House health overhaul spokeswoman Linda Douglass says Obama is willing to clarify the language. Q: What are the odds that these disputes can be worked out? A: Stupak sounded optimistic Monday. "The president says he doesn't want to expand or restrict current law (on abortion). Neither do I," Stupak said. "I think we can get there." Abortion opponent Rev. Derrick Harkins, pastor of the Nineteenth St. Baptist Church in Washington, said he believes it ultimately could hurt the anti-abortion cause if the health care bill collapses because of the divisive issue. "You can't be blanket pro-life and not address those things that encourage women to make the choice of having an abortion," said Harkins, a board member of World Relief, the humanitarian arm of the National Association of Evangelicals. "If you are really looking to reduce the number of abortions in America, one of the things that will make that happen is to have comprehensive health care coverage."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor