|
"We're talking about a hundred stones, if not more," says Martin Kadrman, one of those who launched the Save Charles Bridge initiative. Kadrman reckons that at least 70 percent of the blocks now in place are new and some of the original ones cannot be accounted for. "It's shocking that it's impossible to find where the medieval stones disappeared," he said. "They repair it as if it were an ordinary highway bridge." Goryczkova, too, says a "massive number" of stones were replaced. Kamenik in turn says his company has detailed records about each stone. Only 10 had to be destroyed, and separate documents have been written up for each one of those, he says. The bridge's construction began in 1357 under Charles IV, the Holy Roman Emperor known as the father of the Czech nation. Over the centuries, 30 mostly Baroque statues of saints were erected on the bridge's Gothic balustrade. The statue of the legendary Czech knight Bruncvik, standing alone on one of the bridge's pillars is among the notable sculptures. Legend has it that his magical sword was buried in the bridge and would be swung at times of great national tribulation by St. Wenceslas, Bohemia's patron saint. It may not be time for Wenceslas, but the bridge dispute is assuming major proportions. Kadrman's group filed a criminal complaint last month as part of efforts to discover what happened to missing stones. City Hall may be fined up to 4 million koruna ($211,000; euro155,000) if a regional authority agrees with the Culture Ministry that municipal officials did not take proper care in approving and monitoring the renovations. Jan Knezinek, the head of the city's monument care department, says Prague is not at fault and has followed the advice of Goryczkova's conservation department. Amid the swelling dispute, nearly 50,000 people have signed an online petition requesting that work stop immediately until procedures are reviewed. Among them is Jurg Schweizer, until last year the chief conservationist for the Swiss canton of Bern. "This 'restoration' has been done in a very unprofessional way," Schweizer said in an e-mail message sent to the AP. "Too many stones had been changed, instead of restoring. The new stones don't fit and don't respect the original joints." Any fears tourists may boycott an adulterated Charles Bridge seem unfounded, however. "I think the bridge is beautiful," said Annie Schwartz, a 20-year-old student of psychology from New York City, who was taking a walk across the monument with two friends despite cold winds and snow. "If they don't renovate, it would be destroyed. It's better to conserve what's left," she said.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor