|
Whitman made a similar argument to California voters. She surpassed the previous record for personal spending in a campaign
-- the $109 million New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg spent in his quest for a third term. Another wealthy California businesswoman, former Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive Carly Fiorina, also tapped her personal fortune as she mounted an unsuccessful attempt to unseat Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer. She spent about $6.5 million of her own money, the vast majority of it in the GOP primary. In that race, it proved to be a deciding factor against two lightly funded opponents. In the general election, Fiorina spent just $1 million from a fortune estimated between $25.6 million and $115.9 million, according to candidate disclosure forms. Deep-pocketed candidates for state office fared somewhat better. Florida's Rick Scott spent about $73 million of his own money to win the governor's race, by far the most ever invested in a Florida election. He narrowly defeated Democrat Alex Sink, the state's chief financial officer. In Michigan, Rick Snyder, an Ann Arbor venture capitalist, easily defeated Democrat Virg Bernero. The former president of computer maker Gateway Inc. had kicked off his campaign with a Super Bowl ad in which he declared himself "one tough nerd." He spent about $6 million in the primary. Other state candidates ended up like Whitman, on the losing end despite tapping large bank accounts. Cuomo made passing references to Paladino's spending in the New York governor's race, saying he wasn't a millionaire like Paladino, couldn't afford to fund his own campaign and had to rely on contributions. He ended up easily winning.
Well-known Ohio car dealer Tom Ganley, a Republican, lost to incumbent Democratic U.S. Rep. Betty Sutton despite pouring $7 million of his own money into the campaign. And in Connecticut, Greenwich businessman Tom Foley appears to have lost his race for governor despite spending nearly $11 million of his own money. While Foley has not conceded, the secretary of state's office announced Wednesday that unofficial election results show Democrat Dan Malloy won by a little more than 3,000 votes. Malloy used the state's public campaign financing system and was expected to spend nearly all of the $8.5 million he received for the primary and general election.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor