Tuesday, August 02, 2011
 
sponsored by

County audit, Part 2: Revenue highlights

Send a link to a friend

[August 02, 2011]  Logan County Board finance committeemen look forward to the return of the county's audit each year. The figures provide the most accurate and up-to-date information reflecting the county's current financial standing.

The audit includes both budgeted and actual figures from 2010, as well as results from the year 2009.

Comparing the three sets of figures, as well as considering current information from government associations, colleagues and news sources, helps committeemen identify trends in order to prepare for next year's budget and beyond.

This segment of the audit takes a brief look at highlights of 2010 revenues.

While creating the 2010 budget, the finance committee carefully considered repeat revenues and anticipated those that would likely be affected by the global economic downturn that began in 2009.

Revenues such as property, sales and income taxes were budgeted lower than in 2009 and turned out surprisingly close to what happened.

Property taxes were budgeted at $810,237 for 2010 and actually came in at $808,000. That was down $32,000 from 2009 figures, which came in at $840,000.

Income taxes were down $29,000 at $755,935.

Replacement taxes came in at $318,815. That was $6,000 less than anticipated and down $31,500 from 2009.

Replacement tax is a tax that the state began collecting from businesses in 1979. It replaced the business personal property tax. It can be used for the same purposes as the previous tax -- to pay debt service or support pension or retirements funds; certain places it supports libraries under that entity's jurisdiction; and when these are satisfied, the tax may be used the same as property taxes are used.

Grants commonly supply both repetitive and non-repetitive revenues that bolster Logan County's budget.

[to top of second column]

It was also noted that in 2009 the county received $100,000 in non-repetitive revenue from building permits generated by Rail Splitter Wind Farm.

While no wind farm permits were seen in 2010, an even larger amount than in 2009 is expected to come in during 2011 from Sugar Creek One. And, more wind farms are expected in near-future years.

The county sees its greatest income from wind farms from the one-time building permit fees that the turbines bring in.

Schools see the greater benefit from annual taxes, receiving 65 to 75 percent of the annual property taxes, which increase based on megawatt production.

In total, revenues were budgeted at $5,462,389 for 2010 but actually came in at $5,432,605 -- a close guesstimate at $30,000 less than expected -- as opposed to $5,531,000 in 2009, bringing total revenues down $98,000.

___

Part 3 of the audit's return overviews some of the biggest expenses in the county's general operations and how those are paid.

[By JAN YOUNGQUIST]

Previous article in series

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor