Their votes came in spite of wide bipartisan support for the
last-minute deal, which passed the U.S. House with a 269-161 vote
late Monday night and the U.S. Senate with a 74-26 vote on Tuesday.
President Barack Obama signed the legislation into law shortly after
it gained approval from the Senate.
Tea party-backed U.S. Reps. Joe Walsh, R-McHenry, and Randy Hultgren,
R-Winfield, were two of the 161 votes in the House against the
measure, which increases the amount the federal government can
borrow by $2.1 trillion through 2013.
Both said the legislation doesn't address the country's deficit
sufficiently. Hultgren and Walsh said that in addition to the $2.4
trillion in cuts, a balanced budget amendment to the U.S.
Constitution was needed for their "aye" vote.
"It is my opinion that the proposal approved by the House ... falls
short of what we need to do to put our country back on the right
track. By failing to require Congress to approve a balanced budget
amendment ... prior to any further increases in the debt ceiling,
this bill does not provide the structural changes that I stated were
necessary to earn my support," Hultgren said in a news release.
A balanced budget amendment was a staple for many tea party
candidates during the 2010 election that catapulted them to
Washington, D.C.
"I cannot support this latest deal. It spends too much and cuts too
little ... Democrats still don't get it and refuse to make the
spending cuts necessary," Walsh said in a news release.
The two newcomers were joined by their fellow Republican, six-term
U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson, of Urbana, in voting against the legislation.
Johnson said the cuts outlined didn't go deep enough.
"Under the Budget Control Act, we're still spending more than we did
last year ... I fear this kind of compromise will only maintain the
status quo," Johnson said in a news release.
Two of the state's more liberal Democrats joined the Illinois
Republicans in voting against the proposal. However, U.S. Reps.
Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Chicago, and Jan Schakowsky, D-Evanston, said
the legislation cut too deep into the social safety net provided by
the federal government.
"This is the wrong medicine for a sick economy. This bill could
increase unemployment, slow economic growth and deepen already
historic income inequality," said Schakowsky in a news release.
"Though I have voted to raise the debt ceiling in the past, I cannot
in good conscience support this deal, which requires $1 trillion in
spending cuts that make the middle-class, the poor and seniors
sacrifice."
Schakowsky said she wanted the tax cuts implemented by President
George W. Bush for the wealthiest Americans rolled back before she
voted for the debt-ceiling deal.
[to top of second column]
|
Five Illinois representatives voted against the agreement, but the
other 13 Illinois representatives -- both Democrats and Republicans
-- were part of the chorus of 269 House members voting yes, but for
different reasons.
U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Chicago, said he voted yes out of
desperation more than anything, and he had strong words for those on
the right.
"The tea partyers and the GOP have made their slash-and-burn lunacy
clear, and while I do not love this compromise, my vote is a hose to
stop the burning. The arsonists must be stopped," Gutierrez said in
a news release. "The damage this bill will do to the people of the
4th District, Chicago and the country is real and lasting but pales
in comparison to the damage the GOP was willing to do to the
American and world economies to make a political point."
U.S. Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Peoria, said the legislation is not
perfect, but it's a "step in the right direction."
"While this has been a frustrating and lengthy process, I think the
finished product is something to be proud of," Schock said in a news
release. "It's not perfect. In fact, it's far from perfect, but with
divided government neither side gets everything they want." He said
that the great number of Republicans and Democrats who joined to
approve the legislation was evidence of its support.
U.S. Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Mark Kirk, R-Ill., said they
voted in favor of it to avoid the federal government going into
default.
[Illinois
Statehouse News; By ANDREW THOMASON]
|