|
In a brief interview, Chief Bill Luecke said the department has changed its training protocol, but did not elaborate. He also said officers who had failed to meet the requirement have either made up the course or are doing so. "Everything's cool," he said, before declining to answer additional questions. East Dublin is a town of about 2,800 people perhaps best known for hosting the Summer Redneck Games, an annual competition that involves watermelon-seed spitting, bobbing for pigs' feet and the ever-popular mud pit belly flop contest. There's no city center, but a handful of restaurants, gas stations and convenience stores line the main drag. The police station and mayor's office share a building that was formerly a bank at one of the town's main intersections. The shooting, in a rundown neighborhood within a mile of the police station, incensed activists and others. "It is so appalling to me that some law enforcement will not uphold the law," said Kenneth Glasgow, who directs the human rights group The Ordinary People Society. "The hypocrisy is unbearable." Experts said an officer is generally allowed to fire a weapon if there's an immediate threat of death or serious injury to him or others. But they differ on whether Deal should have been allowed to carry a firearm without the training. Fred G. Robinette III, a retired FBI agent who now works as a consultant on use of force, said the officer should have been required by the department to give up his weapon until he had the proper training. "When he lost his lawful certification, he should have been placed on administrative duty, the same as officers who are similarly taken out of active service while shootings involving those officers are being investigated," said Robinette, a 26-year FBI veteran. "This not a new concept. It is done routinely, all of the time." He said both the department and the officer could be liable. "If he had been minding his own business, and was accosted, he would have been as justified as any citizen to defend himself," he said. "However, it appears that he was acting assertively in his official law enforcement capacity here, and created the confrontation that ultimately resulted in his use of deadly force." Others said Deal could have fired his weapon regardless, as long as he felt he was in serious danger. "A police officer does not lose his inherent right to self-defense just because he didn't attend an annual refresher training course on his department's use of force policy," said Gregory D. Lee, a retired Drug Enforcement Administration agent who has written three textbooks on criminal justice procedure.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor