|
Supporters of the law said they will press for full funding. Erik Olson, who directs food and consumer safety programs for the Pew Health Group, said the health care costs associated with an outbreak of contaminated food alone run into the tens of billions of dollars
-- far beyond what it would cost to put the law's new requirements into place. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, a lead sponsor of the bill, acknowledged the tough spending decisions that will have to be made, but he said food safety shouldn't be sacrificed in the process. "Fiscal responsibility does not necessitate abandoning or neglecting the need of American consumers for safe food," Harkin said in a statement. The new law would: Increase inspections of U.S. and foreign food facilities; the riskiest U.S. facilities would be inspected every three years. The FDA rarely inspected most facilities and farms, visiting some about once a decade and others not at all. Allow the FDA to order the recall of tainted food. Previously, the agency could only negotiate with businesses for voluntary recalls. Impose new safety regulations on producers of the highest-risk fruits and vegetables. Require processors to prepare detailed
food safety plans and tell the FDA what steps they are taking to
keep their food safe at different stages of production. The
government would use the information to trace recalled foods. The law exempts meat, poultry and processed eggs, since they are regulated by the Agriculture Department. Also exempt are some small businesses, which had complained that the new requirements could force some of them into bankruptcy.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor