|
Attorney Nicolo Ghedini noted that Italian law allows for other ways to postpone trials, such as grave illness, and also argued that the law doesn't infringe on the right to a speedy trial, noting that postponements of several months are typical in Italian courts. "Nobody can state that the principle of speedy trial is respected in our country," he said of Italy's notoriously slow justice system. Berlusconi's lawyers also insist the legislation only provides a temporary shield because of the 18-month limit and falls short of granting a full-fledged immunity. The Milan judges say the law creates a de facto immunity. The court could reject the law outright, or back it, which would be a victory for Berlusconi because his trials would remain suspended. Other possible scenarios envisage compromises: One mentioned by Italian newspapers and legal experts would have the Constitutional Court assign individual judges to decide whether Berlusconi has a legitimate impediment for each trial.
"A declaration of unconstitutionality of the law would be a very hard (blow) for the government, not only for the fact that the trials will go on automatically, but also for the symbolic meaning of this," said Chiara Magrini, a legal expert and professor at John Cabot University. Berlusconi has a history of legal woes and makes no secret of his contempt for what he says are left-leaning prosecutors and judges bent on driving him from office. He is also coming off a turbulent period. Weakened by sex scandals, he barely survived two confidence votes last month to cling to power, but his majority in parliament remains shaky.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor