|  The four-year, temporary personal income tax hike of 67 percent was 
			approved on the final day of the previous General Assembly 
			legislature and recently signed by Gov. Pat Quinn. In part, the 
			income tax hike is designed to help Illinois catch up on past-due 
			bills and stop being delinquent on its payments. "Our current 
			backlog of bills stands at $6 billion, and the increased revenues 
			will help address this backlog," said Kelly Kraft, spokeswoman for 
			the governor's Office of Management and Budget. Not quite, according to Topinka, who is in charge of Illinois' 
			checkbook. "By the time we get through four years from now and all of this 
			and what they're able to spend, we will probably have a debt of $12 
			billion of unpaid bills that have yet to be dealt with," the 
			Riverside Republican said. Topinka said her office is now working on getting last August's 
			bills paid. 
			 A plan to issue $8.75 billion in bonds to get social services, 
			hospitals and others the money they are due was introduced at the 
			same time as the tax increase, but the measure did not pass. State Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, has 
			reintroduced the bill in the new legislature as
			
			Senate Bill 3. Democrats, who were the only ones to vote for the 
			tax hike, said borrowing is essential to relieving the state's 
			financial distress. "Without this component of the plan, school districts, social 
			service providers, hospitals and other state vendors will continue 
			to struggle for survival as we slowly climb out of this fiscal 
			hole," Cullerton spokeswoman Rikeesha Phelon said. Because the plan involves borrowing, it needs three-fifths of the 
			legislature to vote aye. That means Republicans who didn't support 
			the tax increase would have to support borrowing. "Republicans have to be willing to support the plan or be ready 
			to tell school districts and hospitals to suck it up while the party 
			makes a political point," Phelon added. Shortly after the income tax increase passed the state House of 
			Representatives, House Republican Leader Tom Cross said his caucus 
			would be willing to consider voting for borrowing, but not without 
			some concessions. "We'll look at it to pay our vendors, but we're going to look at 
			it a different way. It might be a smaller amount; we might say 
			you've got to cut somewhere else; we might say you have to look at 
			(workers' compensation) -- I don't know what else we might say," 
			Cross said. For her part, Topinka has not decided one way or another on the 
			borrowing plan. "It will help to some extent, in terms of paying the bills. I 
			still want to look at that before we sign off on it and see exactly 
			where it goes. I want to read that bill and see exactly what it 
			does. I've signed off on borrowing when I was (state) treasurer, but 
			not all the time," she said. 
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			 However, the bonds do not need Topinka's approval to be issued. 
			Unlike short-term borrowing, which requires the comptroller and the 
			treasurer to give the OK, long-term bonds only need approval from 
			the General Assembly and governor. While the legislature works on the borrowing, Topinka said she is 
			trying to make things so she can pay bills incrementally. Currently, 
			any receipt given to the state has to be paid in full, which has 
			caused a lot of problems, according to Topinka. "If the legislature would allow us to pay at least some of it, 
			then at least we can get -- especially with smaller businesses, who 
			might be holding on by their fingertips -- we will get them 
			something in an orderly, predictable fashion," she said. Some is better than none, said Mike Heath, executive director for 
			Good Samaritan House Ministries, a soup kitchen, food pantry and 
			shelter assistance service in the southern Illinois city of 
			Carbondale. "If you don't know at all when it's coming, that's not a good 
			thing, because you can't plan ahead. If you've got a date, knowing 
			you're going to get part of it, that's better from a budget point of 
			view than knowing nothing," Heath said. Until social services and vendors get paid by the state, they 
			either have to find the money elsewhere or stop the programs all 
			together. "You've got to have money to pay your bills. It's that simple," 
			Heath said. 
			[Illinois 
			Statehouse News; By ANDREW THOMASON] 
			
			 
			
			 
			
			 
			 |