|
Sprinkles will have to prove consumers are likely to confuse its cupcake with Pink Sprinkles, said Jessica Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan who teaches trademark law. She said Sprinkles is a common name for a bakery, the websites are different and the two businesses are not in the same market. "I think it's not so weak a case it was stupid to file it but it's not a strong case," Litman said. Charles Nelson, who owns Sprinkles with his wife, said he tried to resolve the dispute amicably but was not successful. He said there has been confusion between the brands, with people erroneously thinking the couple had opened a store in Connecticut, and that their cupcake mix was for sale in Connecticut. "It's not about competition," Nelson said. `It's just about our name."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor