News...
                        sponsored by

EU court bans insurance sex discrimination

Send a link to a friend

[March 01, 2011]  BRUSSELS (AP) -- The European Union high court ruled Tuesday that insurers and pension plans cannot offer different contracts for men and women because that amounts to sex discrimination.

Under Tuesday's ruling, women drivers across Europe would see their car insurance costs rise even though they are considered safer on the road. Pension and medical insurance plans would have to change when the new rules become effective from Dec. 21, 2012.

Insurers grudgingly accepted the ruling, but say the change will be bad for customers and maintain their current policies are fair. They insist that the typically longer lives of women should be taken into account when offering life insurance policies, for instance.

"The judgment ignores the fact that taking a person's gender into account, where relevant to the risk, enables men and women alike to get a more accurate price for their insurance," said Maggie Craig, the acting Director General of the Association of British Insurers.

The EU had already imposed an equal treatment system in 2007 but left the possibility for some unlimited transitional period. Tuesday's ruling closes that loophole.

Currently millions of insurance policies take gender into account when setting up policies. The court said that is inappropriate, since there are myriad other factors that could also be considered. Gender however is typically easy to check and can point to sound statistical conclusions, the industry says.

"Taking the gender of the insured individual into account as a risk factor in insurance contracts constitutes discrimination," the court said in a statement.

The Belgian consumer group Test-Achats, which brought the case, said the decision is a "historic ruling."

"The equal treatment of men and women must be absolute," the group said in a statement.

Even if women are considered safer drivers, the question remains whether a man should be punished by paying more despite taking special care to drive safely. Test-Achats says there are other ways insurance companies can make a distinction, for example by taking the accident history of a driver more into account.

[to top of second column]

Policies are also decided on the basis that women live longer than men. Test-Achats also questioned why a woman who smokes and lives more dangerously should be assessed by the standards of an average woman while a man who works out, eats healthily and does not smoke cannot see his lifestyle taken into account.

"You have to complement the statistical approach but one which is more respectful of the rights of each individual taking lifestyle into account," the group said.

The British Conservatives called the ruling outrageous.

"It is a statistical reality that young men have more accidents than women so it should be reflected in their premiums," said European Parliament member Sajjad Karim.

"Boy racers will now have even more money to buy unsafe fast cars, whilst safer drivers will be hit hard in their insurance premiums," he said.

Craig, of the British insurance group, maintained however that many people would not be affected, because the consideration of gender varies widely among products and companies.

[Associated Press; By RAF CASERT]

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor