|
But the GOP won control of the House and gained seats in the Senate last fall with the backing of tea party activists demanding deep, immediate cuts in federal spending. They say that an early down payment on those cuts would send a confidence-building signal to financial markets and the business community. Still, difficult negotiations loom between House Republicans, Senate Democrats and the White House over the full-year spending measure. It blends cuts across hundreds of programs
-- education, the environment, homeland security and the IRS among them -- with a slew of provisions that attack clean air and clean water regulations, family planning and other initiatives. Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., said the earlier measure "loads up every piece of the far-right social agenda in one bill, from restricting a woman's right to choose to preventing government from protecting the air we breathe and the water we drink." The White House and many Democrats believe that the two-week time frame is too short for negotiations on the longer-term bill. "The sooner we can agree on a long-term package of smart cuts -- not reckless, arbitrary, job-destroying cuts
-- the sooner we can stop funding the government in disruptive two-week increments that undermine efficiency and spread economic uncertainty," said Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, ranked second in the Democratic leadership. When it came time to vote in the House, Democrats split, 104 in favor and 85 against. The leadership was similarly divided, Hoyer supporting the legislation and Pelosi opposing it.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor