|
"The Senate is more of a battleground," he said. Indeed, a few senators at Thursday's hearing expressed clear opposition. "We cannot marginalize sin," said Sen. Harold Metts, D-Providence. "That's the danger ... I don't hate anyone, but I do believe that marriage is between one man and one woman." Opponents want lawmakers to put the question to voters. A proposed amendment to the state constitution would define marriage as being between a man and a woman. "We voted on casinos," said Chris Plante, director of the state chapter of the National Organization for Marriage. "How much more fundamental is marriage?" The fate of the bill could turn on a provision giving clergy the right to refuse to perform same-sex weddings if they object to gay marriage. Opponents say that doesn't go far enough, and they worry that churches could be forced to host gay weddings, or that religious colleges would be forced to place gay couples in housing for married students. Supporters are working on amendments designed to win over undecided lawmakers. "I think it's really, really close," said Sen. Rhoda Perry, D-Providence, one of the sponsors of the Senate's bill. "A lot of people are going to be working hard to change people's minds."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor