|
Gardner and other defenders of New Hampshire say the country
-- and the candidates -- are well-served because the primary requires close contact with voters, not just name-recognition or advertising cash. Gardner also insists that New Hampshire has a uniquely probing and democratic political culture, of which the primary, dating to 1916, is part. "Right now, the problem is the date of Nevada. We will respond as we need to in order to honor New Hampshire's tradition and to keep our primary relevant," he said. "Not to so would allow us to lose an important element of American democracy forever. New Hampshire will not let that happen."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor