|
With that in mind, exhibitors will be looking to woo contracts from the more than 60 foreign delegations in attendance. Some of those delegates have raised the hackles of anti-arms campaigners who plan to mount protests around the exhibition. Bahrain has been a particular focus amid reports U.K.-exported arms were
used to suppress demonstrations there, and protesters have questioned why
the U.K. Trade & Investment authority will host their delegation. NATO's Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen underscored the challenges facing militaries and the industry alike as he warned that the alliance and its members at some point might not be able to afford the modern military capabilities they need. "To carry out successful military missions, such as the one in Libya, we need to develop, deliver, and deploy modern capabilities. But when our economies are in such a parlous state, this is increasingly difficult to do," Rasmussen told reporters in London on the eve of the conference. He urged allies to undertake multinational solutions to defense spending and operations, cautioning that otherwise NATO will face reduced military effectiveness. "At the moment, we are all trying to do more with the very limited budgets we have. This cannot continue. All of us need to change our approach," he said. "If we use our money more effectively, if we combine our efforts, and if we share our capabilities, then we can do more with less." Because defense procurement and arms development take decades, the exhibition is likely to serve less as a futuristic approach to the market than a showcase for the best technologies to come out of Afghanistan. "You'll see a lot of companies trying to make sense of what the post-Afghanistan environment will look like and presenting a few ideas, but mainly it'll be about the defense industry which has serviced the armies in Afghanistan showing the culmination of their work," Lunde explained. After the last push for Afghanistan contracts will come transitions toward more long-term solutions in the post-Afghanistan world
-- which poses problems for cash and contract-strapped defense companies. To survive, companies will need to adapt their offerings to post-Afghanistan battlefields. But in order to adapt, the companies will need funding
-- such as a government contract -- to conduct the necessary research. "Its a bit of a Catch-22 for all them," Lunde said. "Unless a lot of these companies get contracts very soon, they will not have the funding needed to help themselves actually adapt."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor