Court clears path for $10B verdict in tobacco suit
Send a link to a friend
[September 29, 2011]
ST. LOUIS (AP) -- The Illinois Supreme
Court on Wednesday cleared the way for plaintiffs' attorneys to push
that a $10.1 billion verdict against cigarette-maker Philip Morris
be revived, sending the matter back to the trial court for more
hearings.
|
The court upheld a state appellate court's February ruling that
sends the case back to southwestern Illinois' Madison County. A
judge there had sided with plaintiffs after a two-month 2003 trial
in a class-action lawsuit over Philip Morris' marketing of "light"
cigarettes. The state's high court later threw out that verdict.
With the latest ruling, the plaintiffs expect to argue that a
favorable 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision may be applied to
reinstate the Madison County case.
"The Supreme Court had an opportunity to review the appellate
decision but found no basis to do so," Stephen Tillery, the attorney
behind the lawsuit, said. An attorney for Philip Morris' corporate
parent downplayed Wednesday's development as the court merely
deciding a procedural question about whether the plaintiffs met a
statute of limitations and not the merits of the plaintiffs' bid to
reopen the case.
In 2003, now-retired Madison County Circuit Judge Nicholas Byron
found that Philip Morris misled customers about "light" and "low
tar" cigarettes and broke state law by marketing them as safer,
ending a trial that both sides at the time said was the nation's
first over a lawsuit accusing a tobacco company of consumer fraud.
The state's Supreme Court overturned that verdict in 2005, saying
the Federal Trade Commission allowed companies to characterize or
label their cigarettes as "light" and "low tar," so Philip Morris
could not be held liable under state law even if such terms could be
found false or misleading.
[to top of second column]
|
The U.S. Supreme Court in late 2006 let that ruling stand, and
Byron dismissed the case the next month. But in December 2008, the
nation's high court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled in a lawsuit on behalf
of three Maine residents that smokers may use state consumer
protection laws to sue cigarette makers for the way they promote
"light" and "low tar" brands.
Counting that decision as new evidence, Tillery again approached
the Mount Vernon appellate court in hopes of reopening the Illinois
lawsuit.
That suit claimed Philip Morris knew when it introduced such
cigarettes in 1971 that they were no healthier than regular
cigarettes and that the company hid that information and the fact
that light cigarettes actually had a more toxic form of tar.
[Associated Press]
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
|