|
Breivik testified that he had used "pompous" language and described them instead as "people with great integrity." Bejer Engh challenged him on whether the meeting had taken place at all. "Yes, there was a meeting in London," Breivik insisted. "It's not something you have made up?" Engh countered. "I haven't made up anything. What is in the compendium is correct," he said. Later, he answered with more nuance. "There is nothing that is made up, but you have to see what is written in a context. It is a glorification of certain ideals," Breivik said. Breivik's defensive answers contrasted with the assertive posture he took Tuesday when he read a prepared statement to the court, boasting that he had carried out the most "spectacular" attack by a nationalist militant since World War II. "I think what we are watching is the revelation of a sort of fantasy or a dream," said Christin Bjelland, deputy head of a support group for survivors of the July 22 massacre. Breivik admits he set off a bomb outside the government headquarters in Oslo, killing eight, then drove to Utoya island outside the capital and massacred 69 people in a shooting spree at the governing Labor Party's youth summer camp on Utoya island. He said his victims -- mostly teenagers -- were not innocent but legitimate targets because they were representatives of a "multiculturalist" regime he claims is deconstructing Norway's national identity by allowing immigration.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor