|
Under the new bill, the FDA would collect $6.4 billion in fees from companies over five years beginning in 2013. About $1.8 billion, or nearly 30 percent, would come from new fees, including the first to be paid by generic drugmakers. Whereas most new drugs are reviewed in 10 months, the typical review for a generic drug takes over 30 months. The FDA has a backlog of more than 2,700 generic drug applications awaiting review, according to the Generic Pharmaceutical Association. The new fees will be used to hire more scientists to speed up clearance of generic drugs. The legislation also renews a similar program covering medical devices. Senators hailed the legislation as a rare example of cooperation between Republicans and Democrats, but the fee agreements at its heart had almost nothing to do with Congress. Those arrangements were worked out during more than a year of closed-door negotiations between the FDA and industry groups. The portion of FDA's drug review budget that's underwritten by industry has steadily increased since 1992 and is now more than 60 percent. Consumer advocates complain that the agency has become too dependent on the companies it regulates. They say they were shut out of the discussions. The nonprofit Consumers Union lobbied Congress for a year over what it calls loopholes in FDA's approval process for medical devices. Of particular concern to the consumer group was that the FDA routinely clears some medical implants that are similar to older devices
-- even if the older products were recalled for safety reasons. "This was an opportunity to improve the oversight of devices, and Congress has missed that opportunity," said Lisa McGiffert, who directs Consumers Union's Safe Patient Project. As with prior reauthorizations, companies succeeded in adding a number of measures designed to speed approvals of their therapies. A measure supported by medical-device makers requires the FDA to provide a rationale for denying approval of medical implants within 30 days. Medical-device lobbyists complain that the FDA has become overly cautious when reviewing routine medical devices. Drug manufacturers also won faster approval for drugs that appear to have breakthrough potential. The FDA would be able to accept smaller, shorter clinical studies when reviewing first-of-a-kind medicines for life-threatening diseases.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor