|
"This will depend on the nature of the product, how wet, how liquid-based it is," he said. "What we would hope to find is we would have an infrastructure that would build out." BP seeks to hold both over-mature and young, prospective opportunities, and the move into the Utica Shale is part of that mix, Harrington said. BP now actively drills across Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Decisions by Chesapeake and BP to develop in Ohio come despite a proposal by Republican Gov. John Kasich to hike the taxes that oil and gas drillers pay for extracting the state's natural resources. Ohio's oil and gas association has criticized Kasich's plan as a potential turnoff to drilling activity. He wants to use the proceeds to fund a modest statewide income-tax reduction beginning in 2016. An energy bill proposed by Kasich is moving through the Statehouse that updates state regulations in the face of the shale drilling boon.
Copyright 2012 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor