|
However, Chevron Corp. lawyer Alan Mark argued Thursday that the case had no cause against subsidiary Chevron Canada since the judgment was against the parent company, whose subsidiaries largely operate independently. Fellow Chevron lawyer Clarke Hunter argued that the Canadian units operate with an independent board separated from the U.S.-based parent by several levels of ownership and that none of the boards or management related to the case is in Canada. "There is no other connection to Ontario but for the claim that the assets of Chevron Canada Ltd. are the assets of Chevron Corp," Mark said. The hearing resumes Friday.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor