|
Economists saw the Fed officials' remarks this week as an effort to underscore their resolve to combat unemployment. Some of those who spoke out
-- such as Rosengren and Kocherlakota -- are not voting members of the Fed's policy committee this year. But they still take part in committee discussions and can influence other officials. The policy committee will next meet Oct. 23-24. Most analysts say they don't expect any policy change then, given the major steps the Fed took this month and the fact that the October meeting is so close to the presidential election. But some say the Fed might decide to do more at its last meeting of the year Dec. 11-12. David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors, thinks that if growth doesn't rise significantly by December, the Fed might decide to buy more than the $40 billion in mortgage bonds it's begun to purchase each month. Still, Jones cautioned that the Fed would need to avoid intervening too aggressively. If bond investors began to worry about inflation, long-term rates would likely rise. That would mean higher borrowing costs across the economy. "All of this could have a boomerang effect," Jones said. "It could hurt the Fed's anti-inflation credibility." Among those who express such concern is Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed and an ally of Lacker's in the anti-inflation camp. Fisher said this week that if he had had a vote on the policy committee this year, he would have opposed the Fed's latest moves. "I do not see an argument for letting inflation rise to levels where we might scare the market," Fisher said in an interview with Bloomberg radio.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2012 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor