|
 U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan threw out a
lawsuit seeking to hold the Swiss bank responsible for shareholder
losses stemming from revelations about unauthorized and fictitious
trades made by former UBS trader Kweku Adoboli.
Adoboli, a British trader born in Ghana, was convicted in November
2012 of fraud and sentenced to seven years in prison. He admitted at
trial to making his trades to hide his risk exposures, but said he
was trying to make money for the bank.
Plaintiffs led by two pension funds in Elmsford, New York, claimed
that before Adoboli's trades were revealed on September 15, 2011,
UBS officials including then-Chief Executive Oswald Gruebel had
misled investors by frequently touting the bank's internal controls
and "disciplined" risk culture.
They said UBS "incentivized" traders to take high risks and didn't
properly monitor activity, and should be responsible to shareholders
for the more than 10 percent decline in its stock price after
Adoboli's trades became known.
In a sharply worded decision, Forrest said securities laws do not
require banks to be "prescient or omniscient," such that UBS should
be liable for what "at most" reflected "internal management issues"
and "competing incentives."
The judge, who presided this summer at the civil fraud trial of
former Goldman Sachs Group Inc vice president Fabrice Tourre, said
banks' close ties to recent financial events does not mean they
should always be liable when things go wrong.
"Over the past several years, it has been ever so easy to make banks
the target of lawsuits alleging securities fraud: what banks said,
how those statements failed to match up to what happened, and who
did or should have known," she wrote. "One might think of the tired
but appropriate phrase 'shooting fish in a barrel.'
[to top of second column] |
"But the securities laws have limits; and it is the responsibility
of the courts to ensure that those limits are enforced, and that
lawsuits which cannot withstand the most basic scrutiny find their
way into whatever great beyond awaits suits dismissed for failure to
state a claim," she wrote.
The lead plaintiffs are the Westchester Teamsters Pension Fund and
Teamsters Local 456 Annuity Fund in Elmsford, New York. Tor Gronborg,
a partner at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd who represents them,
declined to comment.
UBS spokeswoman Megan Stinson said the bank is pleased with the
decision.
The case, which names a different plaintiff, is C.D.T.S. No. 1 &
A.T.U. Local 132 Pension Plan v. UBS AG et al, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, No. 12-4924.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New
York; editing by Leslie Adler)
[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
