Accused
Colorado theater gunman competent to stand trial, evaluators say
Send a link to a friend
[December 21, 2013]
By Keith Coffman
DENVER (Reuters) — The former graduate
student accused of gunning down scores of patrons in a Colorado movie
theater last year was found competent to stand trial by court-appointed
sanity evaluators, a judge said Friday.
|
The disclosure by Arapahoe County District Court Judge Carlos
Samour came in the course of legal wrangling over the evaluations
that threaten to delay for months a possible trial for 26-year-old
James Holmes, who is charged with killing 12 people and wounding
dozens more during a midnight screening of the Batman film, "The
Dark Knight Rises", in the Denver suburb of Aurora.
Lawyers for Holmes have invoked the insanity defense for the accused
gunman, triggering an evaluation by state mental health experts that
looked both at his sanity at the time of the shootings as well as
his competence to stand trial currently.
Samour, in disclosing that Holmes was deemed competent in September
to stand trial, did not say whether the evaluators viewed him as
sane at the time of the shootings.
It was not immediately clear when a trial would begin for Holmes, or
whether he would continue to be viewed as competent by the court.
However, longtime Colorado criminal defense attorney and legal
analyst Wil Smith said that he could be found not guilty by reason
of insanity even as he is viewed as competent to stand trial.
"Competency deals with somebody's ability to communicate with his
attorneys and understand the criminal proceedings," Smith said.
Lawyers for both sides have remained silent under a gag order
imposed by a previous judge in the case. An upcoming hearing on
whether to require Holmes to undergo another sanity evaluation will
be closed to the public, the media and victims of the shooting.
[to top of second column] |
Attorneys representing Holmes have said that their California-born
client was in the midst of a psychotic episode when he committed the
mass shooting in July of 2012.
But after sanity evaluators completed their work this fall,
prosecutors filed a motion asking for further testing. In his ruling
on Friday, Samour said that prosecutors believed the experts who
examined Holmes over the summer had "an unfair bias."
Samour did not say why prosecutors objected to the evaluation. He
set the closed hearing for next month to discuss the matter.
Holmes is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and
attempted murder in the case, and prosecutors plan to seek the death
penalty if he is convicted.
(Reporting by Keith Coffman; writing by Sharon Bernstein;
editing by
Ken Wills)
[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|