|
 In a letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last week,
Mead said he has directed the Wyoming attorney general to take
aggressive action to overturn the agency's decision, which he said
would adversely affect the state.
The land ruling was in response to an application from two sovereign
native American tribes living on the Wind River Indian Reservation
to the EPA seeking the same status afforded to U.S. states in order
to implement provisions of the U.S. Clean Air Act.
A subsequent U.S. study found that the tribes should have access to
the land, which includes the city of Riverton, that had been opened
to non-tribal members under a 1905 act of Congress.
The governor told reporters on Friday that the Wyoming Supreme Court
"has directly dealt with that issue and said clearly Riverton is not
within the boundaries of the reservation."
The decision could have far-reaching legal and social implications
for the roughly 10,000 Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone, who
now have access to grant money under the 1970s landmark
environmental law.
The issue has heightened tensions in Wyoming over land management,
sovereign rights and federal oversight.
State and Riverton officials described the determination about
reservation boundaries as "an ill-advised federal agency action"
equivalent to a land grab.
But Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone representatives said the
finding was long overdue for members who have been allowed little
voice in decisions in Riverton on matters like air quality that
impact tribal neighbors.
"We're willing to sit down with all the stakeholders in a spirit of
cooperation and consultation to work through what the determination
means on all these different issues," said Mark Howell, a Washington
lobbyist for the Northern Arapaho.
Riverton residents have expressed worries about everything from
property ownership to home values tied to the EPA decision, said
City Administrator Steven Weaver.
[to top of second column] |
"We're not very pleased about it and it's got a lot of people
concerned," Weaver said. "We don't know if the ultimate goal of the
tribes is to take over Riverton, but we will conduct business as
usual until the matter is resolved in court."
Don Wharton, senior attorney at the Native American Rights Fund in
Colorado and representative for the Eastern Shoshone, said alarmist
statements by the governor and others are fueling unneeded fears.
"All the ownership of the land stays exactly as it was, not a single
house or parcel of land changes ownership and nothing remotely like
that is going to go on," said Wharton.
Legal experts said it was unlikely the case would have implications
elsewhere in the nation because the matters at issue are specific to
a reservation in Wyoming that stretches across millions of acres of
sandstone cliffs and sagebrush flats.
"What the decision does show is a willingness on the EPA's part — and perhaps by the Obama administration more broadly — to take the
side of the tribes in a dispute of this magnitude, knowing it would
almost certainly be challenged," said William Wood, a visiting
professor at Southwestern Law School and specialist in Indian law
and policy.
(Reporting by Laura Zuckerman; editing by Gunna Dickson)
[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
