|
Ronald Meisburg, a partner at law firm Proskauer and the former general counsel at the labor board from 2006 to 2010, called the agreement a "big win for Wal-Mart." "They're very limited to the type of picketing they can do." The UFCW issued a statement says that its agreement to refrain from "picketing" or any actions that can be construed as "picketing" for the 60-day period, doesn't "affect or limit the labor groups' ability to otherwise protest, demonstrate or strike because of Walmart's unfair practices and poor record on labor rights and standards" at other venues. John Logan, professor and director of Labor and Employment Studies at San Francisco State University noted that legally, picketing has a more narrow definition than what one may think. "The settlement... provides very few restrictions to their ability to protest the company
-- workers can continue to speak out and take action, from protests to strikes, to improve working conditions at Wal-Mart," he said. Wal-Mart appears to be listening to the complaints. The retailer announced last month that it would help part-time Wal-Mart workers transition into full-time employment if they want. Wal-Mart said it will make sure that its part-time workers have "first shot" at the full-time job openings in the stores in their area. Wal-Mart said the move will give part-time employees higher earning potential.
"OUR Walmart has been able to raise the voices and concerns of workers at Walmart stores across the country and this resolution ensures that will continue," Colby Harris, a member from OUR Walmart, said in a statement.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2013 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor