|  When the Doolins laid out the plan for a housing development project 
			on the north end of Union Street in Lincoln, they held 23 acres on 
			the far east side of the development for building a home for 
			themselves. The development will feature 14 building sites, with 
			the majority of those at the street's edge. Behind the first line of 
			homes, there are plats for three additional homes with larger lots, 
			and behind that is the 23 acres reserved for the Doolins. Wednesday evening, the initial plan was for the zoning board of 
			appeals to consider a request from the Doolins for a zoning change 
			that would allow them to build a horse stable on their 23 acres. John Sutton chaired the meeting and called it to order. He began 
			by telling the group and the several residents of Union Street who 
			were on hand that there had been an error in protocol, and the 
			zoning board did not have the authority to allow or disallow the 
			building of the stable. 
			 Sutton said the request would have to go to the city's planning 
			commission, and that group would hold a public meeting on the matter 
			at a later date to be announced. What the zoning board could do, though, was move forward with a 
			second request regarding the height limit of buildings in the city. The current zoning rules call for an accessory building to be no 
			more than 18 feet tall at the peak of the roof. The Doolins are 
			hoping to build a stable with a roof peak of 28 feet.  After the board reviewed the request, Sutton told those in the 
			gallery that anyone who wished to speak on the subject needed to 
			stand up and be sworn in, in order to testify. No one stood up. 
			Sutton advised Patrick Doolin that he was required to testify, so 
			Doolin came forward, was sworn in and took a seat at the speaker's 
			table. Doolin told the board that it was his wish to build the stable, 
			and that building his family home on the property would be 
			contingent on being allowed to do so. He said the stable he wants to 
			build would hold six stalls and an indoor riding arena, which is why 
			he was asking for the additional height. He said the building plan was for the structure to measure 72 
			feet wide, 120 feet long, have exterior wall heights of 14 feet and 
			the peak at 28 feet. Doolin was asked if the home to be built would be of a similar 
			height. He said the specific plan for the house wasn't yet finished, 
			but that the two would go together. Doolin noted that the stable or 
			barn was basically the height of a two-story home.  With the building to be constructed at the far side of the 
			property, Doolin said that from Union Street, it would not look 
			excessively large. Doolin was then asked how many horses would be kept in the barn. 
			Doolin said the plan included six stalls. He was then asked if there 
			would be outdoor riding area as well as indoor, and he said his 23 
			acres would include space for outdoor riding. 
			
			 Doolin was also asked to verify an earlier statement, that if he 
			is not allowed to have the barn, he will not build the home. Doolin 
			said that was correct. The board then briefly discussed what decision they were required 
			to make on the matter. The comment was made that it was unclear what 
			the zoning change would need to be. Sutton then said that the only 
			decision the board needed to make was whether or not to allow the 
			height of the proposed structure to exceed the current rule of 18 
			feet. With discussions appearing to be over, Sutton called for a motion 
			and vote, but he was interrupted by a visitor in the gallery. In attendance at the meeting were several homeowners whose 
			property is on the west side of Union, across from the housing 
			development. Lois Vannoy stood up and interrupted Sutton's call for 
			a motion, saying her group had not been permitted to speak on the 
			issue. 
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			 Sutton said that had they wanted to address the board, they 
			should have stood to be sworn in when he called for that. Vannoy 
			said they didn't do so because they had not yet heard what Doolin 
			had to say, and at that time they did not know whether or not they 
			needed to speak. Sutton said it was too late for them to address the board, but if 
			Doolin was willing to answer their questions, they could do that. 
			Doolin said he was willing to do so. Vannoy first asked what had happened to the original plan to 
			build the Doolin residence on the northeast corner of the property. 
			She said that was what was explained when discussions were going on 
			for the housing development. Doolin said he didn't recall ever 
			discussing his personal home in conjunction with the housing 
			project. Vannoy then said that perhaps it had been talked about 
			outside the formal meetings, but it was talked about. Doolin said that in looking at the land, there had been several 
			factors that entered into the location of the home. Among them was 
			the cost of infrastructure and installing water and sewer. In 
			addition, there were considerations to be given to the flood plain 
			on the property. Finally, he said, moving the home site put the 
			horses and stable at the farthest point away from Union Street. Doolin was asked if he planned to have six horses, and he 
			responded that at the moment he owns one horse. 
			
			 He was then asked at what point he decided to build a stable, 
			because it had not been mentioned in the plan for the housing 
			development. Doolin said the stable had always been a part of the 
			plan for his personal home. He also commented that his personal home 
			was never considered as part of the subdivision. Shortly after this, Sutton advised the group that the questions 
			they were asking did not relate to the matter before his board. He 
			said the planning commission for the city would have a meeting about 
			allowing the actual construction of the stables, and that was when 
			these questions should be raised. He was then asked if the planning meeting would be open to the 
			public, and if the residents of Union Street be notified of the 
			meeting. Sutton said that all the meetings were open to the public 
			under the public meeting act, and that yes, Union Street residents 
			would be notified. Additional information that was offered by Doolin before the vote 
			included his plan to plant trees to separate his homestead from the 
			subdivision. He said he has purchased 185 trees, with 100 of them 
			already being over 25 feet tall. The trees will be placed along his 
			property to shield the homestead from the development as well as 
			from Lincoln Parkway on the north. In regard to the height of the barn, he commented that there are 
			already homes, particularly along Tremont Street, that are as tall 
			or taller than what he is proposing. His final comment on the matter 
			was that the structure would not be unsightly and that the view of 
			the building from Union Street would be the narrower, 72-foot side. When the motion to approve was finally made, it passed by 
			unanimous vote. So, while it isn't yet known if the building may be 
			allowed, if it is, Doolin will be able to build the structure 28 
			feet tall. 
			
			 Thursday morning, zoning officer John Lebegue said he is moving 
			to get a meeting of the city planning commission set up, and he is 
			hopeful that the meeting will take place in November, before 
			Thanksgiving. The exact date is not yet known, but he is hoping for 
			Nov. 21. 
            [By NILA SMITH] |