| 
			 Armstrong alleged collusion by Verbruggen during his first Tour 
			victory in 1999 in an interview published Monday in Britain's Daily 
			Mail. 
 			After urine samples showed traces of a banned corticosteroid, 
			Armstrong's team produced a backdated prescription for a saddle 
			sores cream. He was allowed to continue riding toward a victory 
			which revived the sport's popularity after damaging doping scandals.
 			"It's a ridiculous story and, in addition to that, it was not a 
			positive (doping) case," Verbruggen told The Associated Press in a 
			telephone interview. "He must have reasons to come up with these 
			allegations. I don't know what ... maybe to do with his court 
			cases."
 			Verbruggen did say he spoke to Armstrong at the time.
 			"I might have told him that the UCI needs a prescription, but I am 
			sure that was handled by our anti-doping department, not me," he 
			said. "According to our rules, it (the prescription) could be done 
			afterwards." 			
			
			 
 			Armstrong had declined to implicate the UCI during his interview 
			with Oprah Winfrey in January, in which he admitted extensive 
			doping, including with cortisone, during his seven Tour wins.
 			In this week's Daily Mail interview, he claimed Verbruggen 
			instigated a cover-up to explain his positive tests at cycling's 
			signature race, which had been wrecked by doping cases in 1998.
 			"The real problem was, the sport was on life support," Armstrong was 
			quoted as saying. "And Hein just said, 'This is a real problem for 
			me, this is the knockout punch for our sport ... so we've got to 
			come up with something.'"
 			Verbruggen said cortisone ointment had been permitted.
 			"It was a cortisone shot that was not allowed," Verbruggen said to 
			AP, adding that the pattern of Armstrong's tests on four different 
			days was consistent with using a cream. 			
			
			 			
			
			 
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
       The explanation was accepted by French 
				authorities, who held responsibility above the UCI for 
				anti-doping at the race, Verbruggen said.
 				Verbruggen served as UCI president for 14 years, stepping down 
				in 2005 after Armstrong's seventh straight Tour victory.
 				Armstrong's cover-up allegation is expected to be studied by an 
				independent panel being set up by the UCI's new leadership to 
				examine the governing body's past links with the rider and 
				establish if he was protected from scrutiny.
 				"I have never been afraid of any investigation commission," 
				Verbruggen said. "I will participate in everything and I will be 
				never be found (guilty of) anything."
 				Verbruggen, the UCI's honorary president and an IOC honorary 
				member, is a likely target witness for the independent 
				commission. Newly elected UCI President Brian Cookson said in 
				Johannesburg last week the commission could begin work early 
				next year.
 				"What I am really interested in, I have to say, is the 
				allegations (Armstrong) has apparently made ... about the way in 
				which he was given special treatment by the UCI. If that was 
				true, I'd like to know about it," Cookson told the AP at the 
				World Anti-Doping Agency conference. 				
			 
 				Armstrong is expected to be the star witness and has suggested 
				he wants a reduction in his lifetime ban. It was imposed last 
				year by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which also stripped his 
				Tour victories.
 				Verbruggen suggested that the rider was "pulling your leg" when 
				stating his willingness to cooperate.
 				"He wants a 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission.' He wants a 
				commission to find out that he was not the only one (doping), 
				and that he was forced to do it," the former UCI leader said. [Associated 
					Press; GRAHAM DUNBAR, AP Sports Writer] Copyright 2013 The Associated 
			Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |