Congress is out of town through the end of the month, but
lawmakers are already weighing their options for how to address
the deal with Iran, in which Tehran agrees to a six-month pause
in its nuclear program in exchange for eased sanctions worth $7
billion. Lawmakers from both parties are skeptical the agreement
will prod Tehran to give up its nuclear ambitions and say they
will be waiting with even harsher punishment if Iran proves an
untrustworthy partner.
The chairman of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, Democrat Bob Menendez of New Jersey, says
he is ready to work with colleagues on beefed up economic
sanctions against Iran "should the talks falter or Iran fail to
implement or breach the interim agreement."
Arizona Sen. John McCain said he was "concerned this
agreement could be a dangerous step that degrades our pressure
on the Iranian regime without demonstrable actions on Iran's
part to end its pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability."
The Republican said the situation "would be reminiscent of
our experience over two decades with North Korea" and it is
essential to keep the pressure on Iran.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who is a member of his party's
leadership, says he expects the deal "makes it more likely that
Democrats and Republicans will join together and pass additional
sanctions when we return in December."
And Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., adds: "There is now an even
more urgent need for Congress to increase sanctions until Iran
completely abandons its enrichment and reprocessing
capabilities."
The White House says imposing new sanctions now would
undermine international talks, but hasn't issued a veto threat.
In an early Sunday morning announcement, Tehran agreed to
pause its nuclear program for six months while diplomats lead
talks aimed at preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
While talks continue, international observers are set to monitor
Iran's nuclear sites.
But the announcement, after months of secret face-to-face
talks between the United States and Iran, left many U.S.
lawmakers deeply doubtful of the most significant agreement
between Washington and Tehran in more than three decades of
estrangement.
"Congress, I think, will want to make it clear that if Iran
does not live up to these commitments, we will not only insist
that the sanctions be reapplied, but we will have stronger
sanctions against Iran," said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md.
Distrust that Iran was negotiating in good faith was a common
fear across political parties that are otherwise deeply divided.
And ready-to-go sanctions seemed to have rare bipartisan support
across both of Congress' chambers.