|
"You have a right to communicate," Levinson assured. "I don't think anyone is entitled to that kind of grace. If you feel like writing something, you're entitled to write it as long it's not slanderous or libelous or breaking the law in some way. Why anyone would get into a rage about entertainment is beyond me." He harkened back to buzz over "The Crying Game" and Dil's reveal as a transgender woman, along with "The Sixth Sense" and the Bruce Willis character being dead. And there was grumbling over spoiling the purgatory at the end of "Lost," at a time when social media was well on its way to engulfing us, he said. "If the ending is really atrocious, like 'Lost,' then you're probably doing people a favor by letting them know," Levinson said. Etiquette expert Lizzie Post of the Emily Post Institute sees no value in people "posting a million times,
'Don't spoil anything for me, don't spoil anything for me.'" Walk away from Facebook, shut down Twitter if you have to, she said. "If you're not living in the current season you have no claim. It's fine if you have a friend who's really into it and you want to say,
'Don't spoil it for me.' But you can't ask the world around you to completely bend." Has the quality of conversation been damaged by the call for spoiler-free discourse? "What we've lost is the ability to step back and assess what we've just seen," said Danny Glover, who like Puckett is in marketing and pays close attention to social media. "I think overall the live conversation is valuable." Judith Martin, who writes the Miss Manners columns and books, also believes the burden falls mostly on the person holding out for the surprise. "But if the story is really good, it shouldn't make that much difference," she said. "I still enjoy re-reading
'Moby-Dick' and 'The Golden Bowl,' even though I know perfectly well what is going to happen."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.