Thursday, September 19, 2013
 
sponsored by

Oglesby bridge to be demolished next month

Send a link to a friend 

[September 19, 2013]  It has taken a couple of years to get it accomplished, but on Monday evening the Lincoln City Council approved a bid from Stark Excavating for the demolition of the bridge on Oglesby Avenue.

The city has been plagued with issues regarding this project, many of them due to the lack of sufficient funds to actually repair or replace the bridge.

The saga began in February 2011 when then-city engineer Mark Mathon reported to the city that the bridge was no longer safe for vehicle traffic. The bridge was immediately closed, and aldermen began discussing its future. Replacement of the bridge was estimated then to cost well over $250,000 -- money the city didn't have in its budget.

As time progressed, discussion turned to looking at alternatives to replacing the bridge. Melody Anderson, who lives on Oglesby, noted that in the neighborhood, there didn't seem to be a great deal of concern over the fact that the bridge was closed.

Aldermen then began discussing whether the bridge should be replaced or should just be demolished. In the end they made the decision to demolish it and save the money that might have been spent on replacement for the time when one of the other bridges crossing Brainard's Branch might need attention.

In those discussions it was noted that the bridges on Jefferson, Grand, Palmer and Union were all of similar construction and age. Of those four, aldermen considered that Jefferson, Palmer and Union were all more traveled than Oglesby and would cause a problem for the related neighborhoods if they would have to be closed.

Discussions that continued for the next several months addressed questions such as whether the bridge could be saved for walking traffic, if it should be taken out, and if so, how the new dead ends should be finished, if there a need for cul-de-sacs, and more.

In the meantime, the bridge was continuing to deteriorate. This year city engineer Darren Forgy told the council he didn't feel the bridge would be safe for foot traffic. Even as recently as last week, he told the council that with some dollars invested, the bridge could be made safe, but it would be only a temporary fix. He estimated that within the next couple of years the bridge would be a hazard to any type of traffic.

Earlier this year the city went out for bids for a demolition project that would include removing the bridge and doing some finish work at the dead ends. The proposal at that time included doing some curb work and installing permanent barriers to keep vehicles from accidentally driving into the drainage ditch. There were also plans to include some type of decorative element, such as landscaping or planters, to make the area more attractive for Oglesby Avenue residents.

Included in that plan, the city would hire contractors for the demolition, and city street crews would be used to do much of the finish work.

[to top of second column]

But, when the bids came back, the cost of demolition was much more than expected. The bids were rejected, and the city attempted to combine the Oglesby project with another, larger project: Pulaski Street. But they got no takers on that.

Two weeks ago, Stark Excavating was awarded the bid for the Pulaski Street project, and last week Forgy reported that he had talked to Stark about taking on Oglesby as well.

Forgy said he began by asking Stark to match the original low bid of $35,000 for the Oglesby work, but Stark said he couldn't do that. The lowest he would be able to go was $38,250.

Forgy said one of the big issues driving the cost up was the fact that the city had no place close by where the debris from the bridge could be hauled. Stark had told Forgy that if the city could provide such a place within 4 miles of the bridge, he would lower the price, but that wasn't possible.

Last week the council discussed postponing the project once again, but Marty Neitzel pointed out that with each delay, the cost gets higher. She quipped that by next year, the same bid could cost $70,000, and Anderson agreed.

According to Sue McLaughlin, city administrator, the city can stretch the budget to cover the demolition cost, but there won't be money this year to do the finish work.

The council decided to move forward with the demolition, put up temporary barriers at the dead end and try to incorporate the finish work into next year's budget.

The council has had to deal with problems of bids and costs coming in too high on several projects. The Pulaski Street project came in with a bid cost of $1.7 million and an estimated final cost of $2.1 million, considerably higher than expected.

Aldermen have expressed that they are determined to get at least some of these projects started, if not completed, this year, and McLaughlin has told them it is possible, but it will stifle cash flow in the infrastructure budget, and somewhere down the road, other projects may have to be postponed until more money is available.

In the meantime, demolition of the Oglesby bridge will begin early next month, and the Pulaski Street project will begin yet this fall, with expectations that at least one block will be finished before cold weather sets in.

[By NILA SMITH]

< Top Stories index

Back to top