|
 The findings add to substantial evidence that job strain represents
a serious health risk on its own, researchers say.
“What we first suspected was that job strain might be related to
lifestyle variables - that people who are under high job strain
would smoke or maybe eat unhealthy food more, but this was not the
case,” said lead study author Karl-Heinz Ladwig, of the Technical
University in Munich.
“For me this was the most exciting thing, to find out that these
things might not responsible for this unique effect,” he said.
Past research dating back decades has established that jobs with a
combination of high demands and low control over how the work is
done offer a formula for high worker stress.
That particular kind of job strain has long been linked to heart
disease and death. The underlying cause is generally thought to be a
mixture of physical wear-and-tear from the chronic stress itself and
unhealthy coping behaviors like smoking, drinking and overeating.
A few studies in more recent years have connected this form of
worker stress to diabetes, although sometimes the effect was seen
only in women (see Reuters Health article of January 4, 2010, here:
http://reut.rs/1ohWKsl) or was largely linked to coping behaviors.
To explore the connection further, Ladwig’s team followed more than
5,000 men and women in Germany for over 12 years.
None of the participants had diabetes at the beginning of the study,
when each answered a well-established questionnaire to measure job
strain. It included 11 questions, some of which focused on job
demands, such as having to work fast, hard, under time pressure or
with conflicting demands, or having excessive amounts of work.
Other questions were meant to assess the person’s level of job
control, including their level of responsibility and competence for
the job and ability to make decisions in their current position.
Based on the answers, participants were subdivided into groups: low
job strain, high job strain, passive and active.
Participants with demanding jobs who had control over how their work
got done, or those with undemanding jobs, were considered to have
“low job strain.” Those with high job demands and low control over
their work were considered to have “high job strain.”
Apart from job demands, people in jobs that afforded some control
were considered “active” and those without control were categorized
as “passive.”
Almost 300 cases of type 2 diabetes developed during the follow-up
period, and the largest proportion of these, almost 7 percent, came
from the high job-strain group, the study team reports in the
journal Psychosomatic Medicine.
The passive or active categories contributed the next largest number
of cases, followed by the low job strain group, with 4 percent.
The researchers calculated that the high job strain participants had
a 63 percent higher chance of developing diabetes than the low job
strain group.
[to top of second column] |
The results held after the team accounted for age, sex, family
history of diabetes and weight. The difference did shrink somewhat
when researchers factored in socioeconomic status and physical
intensity of work, but remained significant.
In general, the participants with high job strain were more often
female, physically inactive, smoked and had low education levels.
But none of these variables made a difference in the diabetes risk
based on job strain.
That suggests the stress itself is causing the effect, Ladwig and
his team speculate, and the likely culprit is the stress hormone
cortisol, which can alter the way the body regulates blood sugar.
“The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes is a worldwide concern and
this study is investigating the role of job strain in this growing
epidemic,” said Mikaela von Bonsdorff, a gerontology researcher at
the University of Jyväskylä in Finland, who was not involved in the
study.
The American Diabetes Association says that by 2050, one in every
three Americans will have diabetes
Von Bonsdorff cautions that although the authors found high job
strain might increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, it is evident
that other factors such as, socioeconomic position and unhealthy
living habits may be playing a role.
Loretta Platts, a researcher at Kings College London who also was
not involved in the study, said, “It is also possible that the real
influence of stressful work on type 2 diabetes might be even larger
than is suggested by the results found in this study.”
“The investigators could only measure work stress at one time-point,
and it is likely to be the cumulative impact of work stress over
individuals’ whole working lives which may affect their chances of
developing type 2 diabetes, not necessarily stress happening at any
specific time-point,” she said.
“People are very engaged in their job situation and they have no
distance from it and I think that we should get into a balanced life
situation where working is one part which is important but not the
only important thing in the world,” said Ladwig.
SOURCE: http://1.usa.gov/1pHgmLi Psychosomatic Medicine, online
August 6, 2014.
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
