Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.

 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


http://www.lincolndailynews.com/images/frontpage/killebrew2.jpgEnhanced interrogation


By Jim Killebrew

Send a link to a friend  Share

[December 12, 2014]  If I understand the release of the CIA report that reopens the discussion about the use of "enhanced interrogation" there are some people afraid America will tarnish our reputation for using various procedures to extract information from captured terrorist combatants from the battlefields where Americans were being killed.

Their fear of tarnishing the reputations of those terrorists who murdered over 3,000 American citizens on 9/11/2001 seems to outweigh their willingness to discover information to prevent further attacks from the battlefield combatants.

Every few days we hear over our news stations that actually choose to report those atrocities that children are being beheaded when they fail to recant their Christianity; women are being raped and kidnapped and sold into slavery if they fail to renounce Jesus, and men being crucified or killed outright simply for being Christian. Older men on their jihad mission are forcing young girls as young as nine or ten years old into a "marriage" to middle-aged men. These atrocities are real, and they are aimed at those who have given themselves to Christ. Yet, some of the same people who are decrying the past use of "enhanced interrogation" procedures as "torture" have very little, if anything to say about what is happening with a "religion" of extreme behaviors.

 

[to top of second column]

Does that mean those individuals would use the same logic following the attack on America at Pearl Harbor? Does that mean when engaged in any war fought by the United States during the past seventy years that Americans are now at fault for any violence endured by peoples around the world while in the midst of those wars? Does that mean that if any further battlefield combatants are captured and have information of future attacks on American cities there should be no efforts to discover those facts and simply let the attacks proceed as planned by the terrorists? Or does that mean we should sit on our hands regarding interrogations and simply send drones to those populated areas where we know the bad guys are hiding behind human, civilian shields to kill all who get in the way?

[By JIM KILLEBREW]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

 

 

< Recent commentaries

Back to top