| 
			
			 By last year, blue chip names like Sears Holding and Walgreen Co had 
			signed on and industry experts predicted that more than 20 percent 
			of the nation's employees would soon buy their health insurance in 
			this way, compared with less than 2 percent today. But Reuters 
			interviews with nearly a dozen industry executives has found that no 
			major U.S. company signed up their employees for the first time to a 
			private health insurance exchange for 2015. 
 Many of those executives expect a similar situation in 2016, as blue 
			chip employers wait for proof that the new exchanges will save them 
			enough money to warrant the switch, raising doubts about this new 
			business model.
 
 "We have a lot of wait-and-see going on with large employers," said 
			Brian Marcotte, chief executive of the National Business Group on 
			Health, a lobbying group for large corporations. "They are not quite 
			sure yet how they will deliver on managing costs better."
 
 
			 
			U.S. employers provide health benefits for more than 160 million 
			people, mostly by contracting with large health insurers to 
			administer the healthcare benefits that the company funds, with 
			contributions from employee-paid premiums. But as healthcare costs 
			rose steadily, and President Barack Obama's healthcare law required 
			coverage of more medical services, many sought ways to rein in those 
			expenses.
 
 Private exchanges such as Aon Hewitt, part of Aon PLC, aim to be the 
			Amazon.coms of the insurance world, where employees choose and pay 
			for their own plans and competition helps keep prices down.
 
 Employers contribute a fixed dollar amount to help their workers buy 
			coverage, but can save money by no longer managing the benefits 
			within their companies. They are not directly related to the 
			state-based Obamacare insurance exchanges that offer 
			government-subsidized health plans.
 
 Since 2012, employers covering as many as 3 million people have 
			signed on to use the exchanges. A recent report from Mercer LLC, 
			part of Marsh & McLennan, found that 3 percent of large employers 
			were using private exchanges and that 28 percent of employers would 
			make the shift within 5 years, taking a bite out of the business 
			served by major insurers like UnitedHealth Group Inc and Anthem Inc, 
			previously known as WellPoint.
 
 NEW SENSE OF CAUTION
 
 Industry executives are now projecting more caution about when 
			private exchanges will take off. Aon Hewitt said in October that it 
			would lose money on its private exchange this year, after previously 
			expecting the business to be mildly profitable. Aon didn't say how 
			much money it would lose. Insurer Cigna Corp will sell health plans 
			on the Aon exchange in 2016.
 
 
			
			 
			"This is coming. It's just the pace at which we believe the market 
			is going to make the transition" that is slower than expected, said 
			Patty Fontneau, who runs Cigna's private exchange business.
 
 Mercer and Towers Watson's Liazon unit are still seeing growth from 
			serving more mid-sized businesses, which are signing up for 
			exchanges at a higher rate since they have less invested in managing 
			health coverage for employees.
 
 Other insurance experts question whether the forecasts will ever 
			materialize.
 
 "Private exchanges were over-hyped from the beginning," said Dan 
			Mendelson, chief executive of healthcare research firm Avalere 
			Health. Large employers enjoy significant leverage in negotiating 
			down the price of benefits for the many members of their workforce, 
			an advantage that an exchange can't match, he said.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			LARGE MOVE FOR LARGE COMPANIES
 Darden Restaurants Inc, owner of the Olive Garden chain, was one of 
			the first large companies to move to Aon Hewitt's private exchange. 
			Medical costs were rising 8 to 10 percent per year and it had used 
			the same insurer for 15 years. In 2012, it made a "leap of faith" 
			that Aon Hewitt could do a better job, said Danielle Kirgan, 
			Darden's senior vice president for human resources.
 
 It took four months to overhaul Darden's benefits systems and 
			explain the change to employees. The pay off has been lower 
			year-over-year increases in healthcare spending. "We have over three 
			years of seeing rates, and they have been dramatically and 
			consistently less," Kirgan said in an interview.
 
 Starbucks Corp, however, took a close look at the private exchanges 
			to understand them, but has never planned to move its 136,000 
			employees.
 
 "What we tended to learn is that what we do is just easier and 
			better for people," Starbucks Chief Operating Officer Troy Alstead 
			told Reuters.
 
 Large companies who are open to joining the exchanges are now asking 
			to see at least two or three years, and as many as five years, of 
			data on insurance premiums and medical claims from plans sold on the 
			exchanges to be sure that there will not be a sudden increase in 
			premiums to contend with, benefits consultants said.
 
 Some corporations also describe a sense of fatigue after several 
			years of getting their coverage compliant with Obamacare and are 
			loath to make additional changes in short order.
 
			
			 
			Many have introduced health plans with high deductibles to shift 
			costs to employees and want to see whether that will be enough to 
			save money. They are also uncertain about what may be required of 
			them if the Affordable Care Act is changed by a new Congress with 
			Republican opponents of the law in charge.
 Aetna said last month it would spend $400 million to buy private 
			exchange company Bswift and remain competitive against Aon and 
			others. Kerry Sain, who runs Aetna's private exchange business, 
			acknowledged that large companies are just "dipping their toes" into 
			the new model.
 
 Aetna said it will still benefit from Bswift's technology even if 
			the private exchange market does not end up as large as forecast.
 
 Leerink Partners analyst Ana Gupte said large companies need a 
			catalyst to spur them to move onto the exchanges, namely the cut to 
			U.S. corporate tax benefits that come from providing health coverage 
			planned for 2018.
 
 "If that doesn't do it, I think we're pretty much done on this 
			thing," she said.
 
 (Additional reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Seattle; Editing by 
			Michele Gershberg and John Pickering)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |