| 
			
			 That result is similar to outcomes in men whose cancers are treated 
			immediately, the authors write. 
 Prostate cancer often grows very slowly. In some men, such as the 
			elderly or those with serious health problems, it may never need to 
			be treated, says the American Cancer Society.
 
 In the Canadian trial, 993 men with low or intermediate risk cancers 
			were enrolled in active surveillance between 1995 and 2013. By now, 
			more than 200 of them have been observed for more than 10 years and 
			50 for more than 15 years.
 
 “This is the third time we’ve published the key results of our long 
			term surveillance cohort,” said lead author Dr. Laurence Klotz of 
			Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in Toronto.
 
 The men were monitored with regular testing. Treatment was started 
			if the cancer progressed.
 
 As of now, only 27 percent of the men have been treated for their 
			cancers with radiation therapy, radical prostatectomy or 
			androgen-deprivation therapy.
 
			
			 
			Of the 933 patients, 149 have died, but only 15 died from prostate 
			cancer, the researchers reported in the Journal of Clinical 
			Oncology.
 All the men who died from the cancer had metastases by the end. 
			Another 13 patients had metastases but died from causes other than 
			prostate cancer. In all, less than three percent of the men 
			developed metastatic cancer.
 
 That’s similar to the rate of metastases in another study of men 
			with low-risk disease who were treated immediately, according to Dr. 
			Matthew R. Cooperberg of the University of California, San 
			Francisco.
 
 “In recent years, active surveillance has evolved from an 
			experimental protocol to a broadly accepted - in fact, preferred - 
			management strategy for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate 
			cancer,” he wrote in an editorial in the journal.
 
 Twenty years ago, treating every prostate cancer patient was the 
			norm, Klotz told Reuters Health by phone.
 
 “Over the years this has evolved,” he said.
 
 “This whole approach is one of evolution and we can do better with 
			that one or 1.5 percent,” who end up dying from the disease, Klotz 
			said.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			In this group of low-risk cancers, about 25 percent turned out to be 
			“wolves in sheep’s clothing,” he said. Those that metastasized 
			weren’t low-grade disease that spread, rather they were hidden 
			higher-grade disease that doctors missed, he said.
 But doctors are getting better at identifying those cases. Now, 
			magnetic resonance imaging can detect many of the more dangerous 
			cancers that may have missed with a biopsy 20 years ago, Klotz said.
 
 Men in the study who died from prostate cancer succumbed about 15 
			years after diagnosis, usually in their 80s, he noted.
 
 “It really looks like (active surveillance) is a safe strategy for 
			the management of probably 40 to 50 percent of newly diagnosed 
			prostate cancer patients,” he said.
 
 Overtreating prostate cancers that would not ultimately be fatal can 
			lead to incontinence, erectile dysfunction and other problems, he 
			said.
 
 “That’s why I think this approach is so important, if you can 
			significantly reduce overtreatment but you still have the benefit of 
			screening,” Klotz said.
 
 Active surveillance has been widely embraced in Canada and has been 
			somewhat slower to catch on in the U.S., but is becoming more 
			common, he said.
 
 “The bottom line is, it’s catching on and I also think the role of 
			MRI will provide further reassurance,” for doctors and patients, 
			Klotz said.
 
 SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1wFImCZ Journal of Clinical Oncology, online 
			December 15, 2014.
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			
			 |