On Monday, Express Scripts said it lined up a cheaper price for
AbbVie Inc's newly approved hepatitis C treatment and, in most
cases, will no longer cover Gilead Sciences Inc's rival treatments
after trying for nearly a year to win a deeper discount.
The move threatens to undermine profits at Gilead, and was viewed by
Wall Street as a sign that other major biotechnology players,
including Amgen Inc and Biogen Inc, will face steeper U.S. pricing
pressure from insurers. Other drugmakers without potentially
transformative new products, such as Shire Plc, Novo Nordisk and
Theravance Inc, may also be particularly vulnerable, analysts said.
Neither Shire, Novo Nordisk nor Theravance responded to requests for
comment.
Express Scripts will further expand the number of medicines it won't
cover for 2016, including treatments for common illnesses such as
diabetes, pulmonary hypertension and arthritis, said Chief Medical
Officer Dr Steve Miller, in an interview earlier this month. In some
cases, Express Scripts could drop coverage for newer specialty
medicines in the biotechnology field, he said. The timing on
specific drugs will depend on when new competing drugs with similar
clinical benefits are approved for the U.S. market.
Express Scripts first began excluding drugs from its largest
national reimbursement list for 2014, with 44 medications, and
increased that number to 66 for 2015.
The prospect of having their drugs dropped from Express Scripts'
biggest "formulary" list of covered medicines has prompted some
leading pharmaceutical makers to discount their prices, Miller said.
Express Scripts is acting on behalf of clients who need to rein in
healthcare costs, and estimates that the move has so far saved such
employers more than $1 billion in annual spending, Miller said.
Employers "are by necessity asking us to take a more aggressive
stance because the affordability of their benefits is really at
risk," Miller said. "We are going to be opportunistic” in looking
for savings in the future.
Gilead shares dropped more than 14 percent in Monday trading to
$92.90. Shares in Amgen, Biogen and Celgene CELG.O fell more than 2
percent.
CVS HEALTH
The second largest U.S. pharmacy benefits manager, CVS Health Corp,
has said it will exclude 95 prescription products from its
reimbursement list next year, up from 72 in 2014. It expects the
practice will save its plan sponsors over $3.5 billion between 2012
and 2015.
The drugs most under scrutiny include more expensive, "me-too"
products, in categories where several drugmakers compete for similar
patients. Both Novo Nordisk and Sanofi SA are developing slightly
longer-lasting insulins.
Amgen, AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson, respectively sell Enbrel,
Humira and Remicade - all rheumatoid arthritis drugs that work in a
similar way. Companies like Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries and
Actavis want to switch patients to more expensive versions of their
multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's drugs, respectively, before the
arrival of cheap generic competitors.
The effect is already being felt by such Big Pharma players as
AstraZeneca Plc and Sanofi. Both companies warned recently that the
need to offer U.S. price discounts on some of their biggest
brand-name medicines will hurt 2015 sales.
Insurers are pushing back against prices in other categories,
including blood thinners and even HIV drugs and multiple sclerosis
treatments, where there are multiple options for doctors and
patients, observers said.
"The extent of this becoming a broader problem is tied to whether we
get great new drugs for things like asthma, (high cholesterol),
Alzheimer's and cancer," said Sanford Bernstein analyst Ronny Gal.
"If there is a limited pool of money and a bunch of new drugs, the
pressure on older drugs will increase."
[to top of second column] |
DIMINISHING RETURNS
In recent years, the introduction of far cheaper generic versions of
medicines like Pfizer Inc's Lipitor to reduce cholesterol and Merck
& Co's asthma drug Singulair helped insurers save on reimbursement
costs. But that wave of patent expiries has slowed considerably.
In the meantime, a new crop of novel, and in some cases, highly
effective treatments for cancer and hepatitis C are costing them
tens of billions of dollars more to reimburse.
The influx of generics "allowed the system to actually see drug
price deflation," said Asher Anolic, manager of Fidelity's Select
Pharmaceuticals Portfolio. "At the same time, others are launching
innovative new drugs ... Based on those dynamics I get more
concerned. Where is the give in the system? It's on the legacy
products."
Anolic said his Fidelity fund focuses on drugmakers with highly
differentiated portfolios of treatments. Its top holdings as of Sept
30 included Actavis, AbbVie, Novartis AG and Bristol-Myers Squibb
Co.
"When you look at the industry as a whole, we will probably see less
profitability," said Nils Behnke, a partner at consulting firm Bain
& Co. "Mid-sized companies with a broader portfolio of little
products, 'me-too' products - they will have a hard time."
Murray Aitken, vice president at healthcare information company IMS
Health, estimates that 2014 spending on new and innovative
brand-name drugs will total about $20 billion compared with about $3
billion in 2012.
Industry executives say newer health plans, whether purchased by
individual consumers or offered through an employer, will further
accelerate efforts to limit drug prices because they require
patients to pay a higher share of prescription costs.
Pharmacy benefits companies like Express Scripts say they will cover
an excluded medicine if that specific treatment is deemed medically
necessary for a patient. Some groups have expressed concern that
patient care might be compromised.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a leading
drug industry trade group, said such practices hurt patients by
limiting access to a range of appropriate medicines and potentially
discriminating against certain conditions.
But insurers say that the high price of new drugs set by
manufacturers has already deterred some patients from following
doctor's orders.
"Plan sponsors, because of the rapid rise in cost, are many times
having to ask the consumer to pay more" for their medicines, said
Express Scripts' Miller. "If you can't afford your healthcare, you
don't take it."
(Reporting by Deena Beasley; Editing by Michele Gershberg and John
Pickering)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|