| 
			
			 On Monday, Express Scripts said it lined up a cheaper price for 
			AbbVie Inc's newly approved hepatitis C treatment and, in most 
			cases, will no longer cover Gilead Sciences Inc's rival treatments 
			after trying for nearly a year to win a deeper discount. 
 The move threatens to undermine profits at Gilead, and was viewed by 
			Wall Street as a sign that other major biotechnology players, 
			including Amgen Inc and Biogen Inc, will face steeper U.S. pricing 
			pressure from insurers. Other drugmakers without potentially 
			transformative new products, such as Shire Plc, Novo Nordisk and 
			Theravance Inc, may also be particularly vulnerable, analysts said. 
			Neither Shire, Novo Nordisk nor Theravance responded to requests for 
			comment.
 
 
			
			 
			Express Scripts will further expand the number of medicines it won't 
			cover for 2016, including treatments for common illnesses such as 
			diabetes, pulmonary hypertension and arthritis, said Chief Medical 
			Officer Dr Steve Miller, in an interview earlier this month. In some 
			cases, Express Scripts could drop coverage for newer specialty 
			medicines in the biotechnology field, he said. The timing on 
			specific drugs will depend on when new competing drugs with similar 
			clinical benefits are approved for the U.S. market.
 
 Express Scripts first began excluding drugs from its largest 
			national reimbursement list for 2014, with 44 medications, and 
			increased that number to 66 for 2015.
 
 The prospect of having their drugs dropped from Express Scripts' 
			biggest "formulary" list of covered medicines has prompted some 
			leading pharmaceutical makers to discount their prices, Miller said.
 
 Express Scripts is acting on behalf of clients who need to rein in 
			healthcare costs, and estimates that the move has so far saved such 
			employers more than $1 billion in annual spending, Miller said.
 
 Employers "are by necessity asking us to take a more aggressive 
			stance because the affordability of their benefits is really at 
			risk," Miller said. "We are going to be opportunistic” in looking 
			for savings in the future.
 
 Gilead shares dropped more than 14 percent in Monday trading to 
			$92.90. Shares in Amgen, Biogen and Celgene CELG.O fell more than 2 
			percent.
 
 CVS HEALTH
 
 The second largest U.S. pharmacy benefits manager, CVS Health Corp, 
			has said it will exclude 95 prescription products from its 
			reimbursement list next year, up from 72 in 2014. It expects the 
			practice will save its plan sponsors over $3.5 billion between 2012 
			and 2015.
 
 The drugs most under scrutiny include more expensive, "me-too" 
			products, in categories where several drugmakers compete for similar 
			patients. Both Novo Nordisk and Sanofi SA are developing slightly 
			longer-lasting insulins.
 
			
			 
			
 Amgen, AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson, respectively sell Enbrel, 
			Humira and Remicade - all rheumatoid arthritis drugs that work in a 
			similar way. Companies like Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries and 
			Actavis want to switch patients to more expensive versions of their 
			multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's drugs, respectively, before the 
			arrival of cheap generic competitors.
 
 The effect is already being felt by such Big Pharma players as 
			AstraZeneca Plc and Sanofi. Both companies warned recently that the 
			need to offer U.S. price discounts on some of their biggest 
			brand-name medicines will hurt 2015 sales.
 
			Insurers are pushing back against prices in other categories, 
			including blood thinners and even HIV drugs and multiple sclerosis 
			treatments, where there are multiple options for doctors and 
			patients, observers said.
 "The extent of this becoming a broader problem is tied to whether we 
			get great new drugs for things like asthma, (high cholesterol), 
			Alzheimer's and cancer," said Sanford Bernstein analyst Ronny Gal. 
			"If there is a limited pool of money and a bunch of new drugs, the 
			pressure on older drugs will increase."
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			DIMINISHING RETURNS
 In recent years, the introduction of far cheaper generic versions of 
			medicines like Pfizer Inc's Lipitor to reduce cholesterol and Merck 
			& Co's asthma drug Singulair helped insurers save on reimbursement 
			costs. But that wave of patent expiries has slowed considerably.
 
 In the meantime, a new crop of novel, and in some cases, highly 
			effective treatments for cancer and hepatitis C are costing them 
			tens of billions of dollars more to reimburse.
 
 The influx of generics "allowed the system to actually see drug 
			price deflation," said Asher Anolic, manager of Fidelity's Select 
			Pharmaceuticals Portfolio. "At the same time, others are launching 
			innovative new drugs ... Based on those dynamics I get more 
			concerned. Where is the give in the system? It's on the legacy 
			products."
 
 Anolic said his Fidelity fund focuses on drugmakers with highly 
			differentiated portfolios of treatments. Its top holdings as of Sept 
			30 included Actavis, AbbVie, Novartis AG and Bristol-Myers Squibb 
			Co.
 
			
			 
			
 "When you look at the industry as a whole, we will probably see less 
			profitability," said Nils Behnke, a partner at consulting firm Bain 
			& Co. "Mid-sized companies with a broader portfolio of little 
			products, 'me-too' products - they will have a hard time."
 
 Murray Aitken, vice president at healthcare information company IMS 
			Health, estimates that 2014 spending on new and innovative 
			brand-name drugs will total about $20 billion compared with about $3 
			billion in 2012.
 
 Industry executives say newer health plans, whether purchased by 
			individual consumers or offered through an employer, will further 
			accelerate efforts to limit drug prices because they require 
			patients to pay a higher share of prescription costs.
 
 Pharmacy benefits companies like Express Scripts say they will cover 
			an excluded medicine if that specific treatment is deemed medically 
			necessary for a patient. Some groups have expressed concern that 
			patient care might be compromised.
 
 The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a leading 
			drug industry trade group, said such practices hurt patients by 
			limiting access to a range of appropriate medicines and potentially 
			discriminating against certain conditions.
 
 But insurers say that the high price of new drugs set by 
			manufacturers has already deterred some patients from following 
			doctor's orders.
 
 "Plan sponsors, because of the rapid rise in cost, are many times 
			having to ask the consumer to pay more" for their medicines, said 
			Express Scripts' Miller. "If you can't afford your healthcare, you 
			don't take it."
 
 (Reporting by Deena Beasley; Editing by Michele Gershberg and John 
			Pickering)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 
			
			 |